M. Pitt
Impact in
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Nuclear physics research studies
- Astronomical and nuclear sciences
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Papers in
-
- Nuclear physics research studies 3
-
- Atomic and Molecular Physics 6
- Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research 2
- Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics 2
- Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research 1
- Journals
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment (3 papers)Nuclear Physics A (2 papers)Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer (1 paper)Physical Review Letters (1 paper)Physical Review C (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandRussia
In The Last Decade
M. Pitt
11 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 86
- Radiation 33
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 96
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 49
- Mechanics of Materials 58
Countries citing papers authored by M. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Pitt. The network helps show where M. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 2 | ACHIEVING BEAM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PARITY EXPERIMENTS AT JEFFERSON LAB | 2004 | 0 |
| 3 | An Energy Feedback System for the MIT/Bates Linear Accelerator | 1999 | 3 |
| 4 | 1999 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 101 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 35 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 22 |
About M. Pitt
M. Pitt is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Radiation and Spectroscopy, having authored 12 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (6 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (3 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (2 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (2 papers) and Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (86 citations), Radiation (33 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (96 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (49 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (58 citations). M. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ward Whaling, A. E. Champagne, M. J. Musolf, W. Happer, G. Ulm, J. A. Clayhold, E. Otten, T. E. Chupp, J. Bonn and Masao Kitano. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment, Nuclear Physics A, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, Physical Review Letters and Physical Review C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.