M. Nakajima
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 1%
- Accounting top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Hiroshi EisakiAkira IyoChul‐Ho LeeKunihiro KihouShigeyuki IshidaT. ItoY. TomiokaS. Uchida
- Topics
- Iron-based superconductors research (64 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (40 papers)Rare-earth and actinide compounds (29 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. Nakajima
77 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.2k
- Condensed Matter Physics 931
- Accounting 379
- Strategy and Management 215
- Global and Planetary Change 77
Countries citing papers authored by M. Nakajima
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Nakajima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Nakajima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Nakajima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Nakajima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Nakajima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Nakajima. The network helps show where M. Nakajima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Nakajima
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Nakajima. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Nakajima based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Nakajima. M. Nakajima is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 80 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | Carrier doping versus impurity potential effect in transition metal-substituted iron-based superconductors | 1 |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Change of oceanic condition due to the man-made structure for upwelling | 3 |
| 20 | On the effect of man-made structure for upwelling as an artificial reef | 2 |
About M. Nakajima
M. Nakajima is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Accounting, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Iron-based superconductors research (64 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (40 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (29 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (931 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.2k citations) and Accounting (379 citations). M. Nakajima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hiroshi Eisaki, Akira Iyo, Chul‐Ho Lee, Kunihiro Kihou, Shigeyuki Ishida, T. Ito, Y. Tomioka, S. Uchida, T. Kakeshita and Tian Liang. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Nature Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.