G. Chabrier
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.1%
- Instrumentation top 0.5%
- Geophysics top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- I. BaraffeD. SaumonF. AllardA. Y. PotekhinP. HennebelleH. M. van HornD. HomeierP. H. Hauschildt
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (105 papers)Astro and Planetary Science (85 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (82 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
G. Chabrier
174 papers receiving 9.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 8.7k
- Instrumentation 1.8k
- Geophysics 1.4k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
- Atmospheric Science 624
Countries citing papers authored by G. Chabrier
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Chabrier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Chabrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Chabrier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Chabrier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Chabrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Chabrier. The network helps show where G. Chabrier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Chabrier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Chabrier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Chabrier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Chabrier. G. Chabrier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 49 | |
| 8 | 73 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 72 | |
| 12 | New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limitbreakdown → | 853 |
| 13 | 157 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | Seismological comparison of giant planet interior models. | 8 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Non-Adiabatic Models of Jupiter and Saturn | 6 |
About G. Chabrier
G. Chabrier is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Geophysics, having authored 180 papers that have together received 10.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (105 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (85 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (82 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (8.7k citations), Instrumentation (1.8k citations) and Geophysics (1.4k citations). G. Chabrier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include I. Baraffe, D. Saumon, F. Allard, A. Y. Potekhin, P. Hennebelle, H. M. van Horn, D. Homeier, P. H. Hauschildt, B. Commerçon and Travis Barman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.