M. Meredith Gillis

432 total citations
8 papers, 319 citations indexed

About

M. Meredith Gillis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Meredith Gillis has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 319 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in M. Meredith Gillis's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). M. Meredith Gillis is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (2 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers). M. Meredith Gillis collaborates with scholars based in United States. M. Meredith Gillis's co-authors include Elizabeth A. Phelps, Mauricio R. Delgado, Benjamin M. Hampstead, Anthony Y. Stringer, Sarah García, Divya S. Khurana and Reem A. Tarazi and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Neuroscience, Behavioural Brain Research and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

In The Last Decade

M. Meredith Gillis

8 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Meredith Gillis United States	7	197	83	82	42	33	8	319
Magdalena Senderecka Poland	11	343 1.7×	94 1.1×	100 1.2×	27 0.6×	15 0.5×	30	435
Chiara Guerrini United Kingdom	10	359 1.8×	97 1.2×	102 1.2×	24 0.6×	19 0.6×	15	497
Melissa‐Ann Mackie United States	9	371 1.9×	146 1.8×	88 1.1×	41 1.0×	15 0.5×	15	518
Samantha J. Fede United States	10	173 0.9×	56 0.7×	31 0.4×	67 1.6×	42 1.3×	19	334
Lydia Hellrung Germany	11	241 1.2×	62 0.7×	26 0.3×	70 1.7×	27 0.8×	20	390
Benjamin L. Jacobson United States	6	461 2.3×	100 1.2×	75 0.9×	50 1.2×	33 1.0×	6	584
Huqing Shi China	8	229 1.2×	111 1.3×	78 1.0×	58 1.4×	26 0.8×	11	326
Craig Easdon Canada	8	198 1.0×	62 0.7×	42 0.5×	47 1.1×	94 2.8×	10	370
Yvonne Maas Belgium	9	202 1.0×	151 1.8×	77 0.9×	97 2.3×	15 0.5×	11	332
Méadhbh Brosnan Australia	11	247 1.3×	34 0.4×	65 0.8×	16 0.4×	29 0.9×	15	366

Countries citing papers authored by M. Meredith Gillis

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Meredith Gillis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Meredith Gillis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Meredith Gillis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Meredith Gillis

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Meredith Gillis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Meredith Gillis. The network helps show where M. Meredith Gillis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Meredith Gillis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Meredith Gillis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Meredith Gillis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Meredith Gillis. M. Meredith Gillis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Gillis, M. Meredith, et al.. (2018). Neuropsychological outcome following thalamic stroke in adolescence: an identical twin comparison. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 33(5). 905–927. 5 indexed citations

Gillis, M. Meredith, Sarah García, & Benjamin M. Hampstead. (2016). Working memory contributes to the encoding of object location associations: Support for a 3-part model of object location memory. Behavioural Brain Research. 311. 192–200. 15 indexed citations

Gillis, M. Meredith, et al.. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates spatial memory in cognitively intact adults. Behavioural Brain Research. 283. 191–195. 10 indexed citations

Gillis, M. Meredith & Benjamin M. Hampstead. (2014). A two-part preliminary investigation of encoding-related activation changes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: hyperactivation, repetition suppression, and the role of the prefrontal cortex. Brain Imaging and Behavior. 9(4). 801–820. 13 indexed citations

Gillis, M. Meredith, et al.. (2014). RBANS Memory Indices Are Related to Medial Temporal Lobe Volumetrics in Healthy Older Adults and Those with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 29(4). 322–328. 34 indexed citations

Gillis, M. Meredith, et al.. (2013). Impaired retention is responsible for temporal order memory deficits in mild cognitive impairment. Acta Psychologica. 143(1). 88–95. 21 indexed citations

Hampstead, Benjamin M., M. Meredith Gillis, & Anthony Y. Stringer. (2013). Cognitive Rehabilitation of Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Methodological Review and Model for Future Research. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 20(2). 135–151. 53 indexed citations

Delgado, Mauricio R., M. Meredith Gillis, & Elizabeth A. Phelps. (2008). Regulating the expectation of reward via cognitive strategies. Nature Neuroscience. 11(8). 880–881. 168 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact