M M Panjabi
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Surgery top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Josef DvořákJoseph J. CriscoJ. E. NovotnyD. GrobAnita N. VasavadaI. YamamotoMasaya MimuraThomas R. Oxland
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (17 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (11 papers)Medical Imaging and Analysis (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandJapan
In The Last Decade
M M Panjabi
21 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.9k
- Pharmacology 1.7k
- Surgery 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 525
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 367
Countries citing papers authored by M M Panjabi
This map shows the geographic impact of M M Panjabi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M M Panjabi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M M Panjabi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M M Panjabi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M M Panjabi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M M Panjabi. The network helps show where M M Panjabi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M M Panjabi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M M Panjabi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M M Panjabi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M M Panjabi. M M Panjabi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 70 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 331 | |
| 6 | 145 | |
| 7 | 241 | |
| 8 | The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part I. Function, Dysfunction, Adaptation, and Enhancementbreakdown → | 1507 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 172 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 176 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | What constitutes spinal instability? | 35 |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 102 | |
| 17 | Spinal stability: evaluation and treatment. | 17 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | Biomechanics of the thoracic spinal cord and thorax in experimentally produced trauma. | 3 |
| 20 | Spinal cord deformation velocity, impulse, and energy related to lesion volume in "standardized" trauma. | 9 |
About M M Panjabi
M M Panjabi is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 21 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (17 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (11 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.9k citations), Pharmacology (1.7k citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (367 citations). M M Panjabi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Josef Dvořák, Joseph J. Crisco, J. E. Novotny, D. Grob, Anita N. Vasavada, I. Yamamoto, Masaya Mimura, Thomas R. Oxland, Vijay K. Goel and JOANNE DURANCEAU. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Spine and Journal of Biomechanics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.