M. Jane Black
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Megan R. SutherlandJohn F. BertramLina GubhajuRichard HardingMonika ZimanyiRobert De MatteoJonathan G. BensleyKyungjoon Lim
- Topics
- Birth, Development, and Health (72 papers)Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (45 papers)Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (19 papers)
- Journals
- JAMACirculationPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
M. Jane Black
128 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 2.7k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.0k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 973
Countries citing papers authored by M. Jane Black
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Jane Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Jane Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Jane Black more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Jane Black
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Jane Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Jane Black. The network helps show where M. Jane Black may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Jane Black
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Jane Black. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Jane Black based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Jane Black. M. Jane Black is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 89 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 88 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About M. Jane Black
M. Jane Black is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 129 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (72 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (45 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.1k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (2.7k citations) and Nephrology (326 citations). M. Jane Black has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Megan R. Sutherland, John F. Bertram, Lina Gubhaju, Richard Harding, Monika Zimanyi, Robert De Matteo, Jonathan G. Bensley, Kyungjoon Lim, Lynette Moore and Annick Bogaerts. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Circulation and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.