H. Middleton

77.5k total citations
22 papers, 368 citations indexed

About

H. Middleton is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Middleton has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 368 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5 papers in Geophysics and 3 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in H. Middleton's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). H. Middleton is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (8 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). H. Middleton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. H. Middleton's co-authors include A. Vecchio, W. Del Pozzo, Alberto Sesana, Siyuan Chen, Will M. Farr, P. A. Rosado, A. Melatos, S. Vitale, J. Veitch and L. Dunn and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and American Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

H. Middleton

20 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. Middleton United Kingdom 10 344 71 65 36 23 22 368
Yi Feng China 12 365 1.1× 37 0.5× 90 1.4× 27 0.8× 17 0.7× 42 402
Michael L. Katz United States 13 560 1.6× 49 0.7× 129 2.0× 41 1.1× 21 0.9× 19 607
M. B. Mickaliger United Kingdom 9 365 1.1× 51 0.7× 68 1.0× 65 1.8× 28 1.2× 25 373
A. Noutsos Germany 10 356 1.0× 45 0.6× 153 2.4× 26 0.7× 21 0.9× 15 391
K. Lazaridis Germany 5 325 0.9× 76 1.1× 80 1.2× 32 0.9× 29 1.3× 7 328
Natalia Korsakova France 8 212 0.6× 44 0.6× 48 0.7× 29 0.8× 9 0.4× 15 247
Stanislav Babak Germany 6 403 1.2× 38 0.5× 123 1.9× 18 0.5× 21 0.9× 7 419
J. Khoo Australia 9 295 0.9× 83 1.2× 74 1.1× 24 0.7× 54 2.3× 12 317
D. C. Sheppard Australia 2 353 1.0× 75 1.1× 127 2.0× 33 0.9× 25 1.1× 2 366
Lawrence Toomey Australia 8 296 0.9× 55 0.8× 77 1.2× 26 0.7× 47 2.0× 12 304

Countries citing papers authored by H. Middleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Middleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Middleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Middleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Middleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Middleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Middleton. The network helps show where H. Middleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Middleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Middleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Middleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Middleton. H. Middleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davies, G. S., I. W. Harry, M. J. Williams, et al.. (2025). Premerger observation and characterization of massive black hole binaries. Physical review. D. 111(4). 6 indexed citations
2.
Knee, A. M., E. Goetz, J. McIver, et al.. (2024). Search for continuous gravitational waves directed at subthreshold radiometer candidates in O3 LIGO data. Physical review. D. 109(6). 3 indexed citations
3.
Suvorova, Sofia, et al.. (2024). Adaptive cancellation of mains power interference in continuous gravitational wave searches with a hidden Markov model. Physical review. D. 110(12). 2 indexed citations
4.
Middleton, H., C. J. Moore, Siyuan Chen, et al.. (2023). Implications of pulsar timing array observations for LISA detections of massive black hole binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 525(2). 2851–2863. 13 indexed citations
5.
Pratten, G., Antoine Klein, C. J. Moore, et al.. (2023). LISA science performance in observations of short-lived signals from massive black hole binary coalescences. Physical review. D. 107(12). 13 indexed citations
6.
Korol, Valeriya, et al.. (2023). Identifying LISA verification binaries among the Galactic population of double white dwarfs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 522(4). 5358–5373. 35 indexed citations
7.
Middleton, H., Alberto Sesana, Siyuan Chen, et al.. (2023). Correction to: Massive black hole binary systems and the NANOGrav 12.5 yr results. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 526(1). L34–L34. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rinaldi, S., H. Middleton, W. Del Pozzo, & J. R. Gair. (2023). Bayesian analysis of systematic errors in the determination of the constant of gravitation. The European Physical Journal C. 83(10). 3 indexed citations
9.
Pratten, G., P. Schmidt, H. Middleton, & A. Vecchio. (2023). Precision tracking of massive black hole spin evolution with LISA. Physical review. D. 108(12). 11 indexed citations
10.
Jones, D. H., L. Sun, J. B. Carlin, et al.. (2022). Validating continuous gravitational-wave candidates from a semicoherent search using Doppler modulation and an effective point spread function. Physical review. D. 106(12). 8 indexed citations
11.
Middleton, H., et al.. (2022). An estimate of the stochastic gravitational wave background from the MassiveBlackII simulation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 511(4). 5241–5250. 9 indexed citations
12.
Reardon, Daniel J., R. M. Shannon, A D Cameron, et al.. (2021). The Parkes pulsar timing array second data release: timing analysis. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 507(2). 2137–2153. 41 indexed citations
13.
Middleton, H., Alberto Sesana, Siyuan Chen, et al.. (2021). Massive black hole binary systems and the NANOGrav 12.5 yr results. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 502(1). L99–L103. 55 indexed citations
14.
Cooper, S. J., Anna Gréen, H. Middleton, & C. P. L. Berry. (2020). scooper93/gwexhibit: Initial release of Gravitational Wave Exhibit. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
16.
Middleton, H., et al.. (2018). Characterization of low-significance gravitational-wave compact binary sources. Physical review. D. 98(12). 8 indexed citations
17.
Chen, Siyuan, H. Middleton, Alberto Sesana, W. Del Pozzo, & A. Vecchio. (2017). Probing the assembly history and dynamical evolution of massive black hole binaries with pulsar timing arrays. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 468(1). 404–417. 20 indexed citations
18.
Middleton, H., W. Del Pozzo, Will M. Farr, Alberto Sesana, & A. Vecchio. (2015). Astrophysical constraints on massive black hole binary evolution from pulsar timing arrays. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 455(1). L72–L76. 24 indexed citations
19.
Farr, B., C. P. L. Berry, Will M. Farr, et al.. (2015). Parameter estimation on gravitational waves from neutron-star binaries with spinning components. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 2015.
20.
Berry, C. P. L., Ilya Mandel, H. Middleton, et al.. (2015). PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR BINARY NEUTRON-STAR COALESCENCES WITH REALISTIC NOISE DURING THE ADVANCED LIGO ERA. The Astrophysical Journal. 804(2). 114–114. 89 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026