M. J. Cresswell
- Artificial Intelligence top 0.5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- Co-authors
- G. E. HughesArnim von StechowG. D. DuthieJon BarwiseJohn PerryGeoffrey HunterRenate BartschC. Anthony Anderson
- Topics
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (28 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (16 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers)
- Cited by
- Computational Theory and MathematicsArtificial IntelligenceExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
M. J. Cresswell
87 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Artificial Intelligence 1.9k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.0k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 654
- Philosophy 466
- Language and Linguistics 336
Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Cresswell
This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Cresswell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Cresswell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Cresswell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Cresswell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Cresswell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Cresswell. The network helps show where M. J. Cresswell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Cresswell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Cresswell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Cresswell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Cresswell. M. J. Cresswell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mathematical Entities in the Divided Line | 2 |
| 2 | The modal predicate logic of real time | 1 |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Mark Richard , Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How we Ascribe Them . Reviewed by | 1 |
| 11 | Semantical Essays: Possible Worlds and their Rivals | 4 |
| 12 | A companion to modal logic: some corrections | 2 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 78 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About M. J. Cresswell
M. J. Cresswell is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (28 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (16 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.0k citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.9k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (654 citations). M. J. Cresswell has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include G. E. Hughes, Arnim von Stechow, G. D. Duthie, Jon Barwise, John Perry, Geoffrey Hunter, Renate Bartsch, C. Anthony Anderson, Roger Sharrock and D. M. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, The Philosophical Review and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.