M H Hall

947 total citations
11 papers, 663 citations indexed

About

M H Hall is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, M H Hall has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 663 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in M H Hall's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (2 papers). M H Hall is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Challenges (2 papers). M H Hall collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Russia. M H Hall's co-authors include Ian MacGillivray, PJ Danielian, Roy Carr‐Hill, Cynthia Fraser, Doris M. Campbell, John Lemon, Rosaline S. Barbour, C D Florey, Peter Howie and Marvin Reid and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Pathology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

M H Hall

11 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M H Hall United Kingdom	9	400	372	125	118	112	11	663
Janice Bakewell United States	8	283 0.7×	230 0.6×	64 0.5×	46 0.4×	41 0.4×	8	460
Peter Drake United States	3	232 0.6×	184 0.5×	77 0.6×	137 1.2×	40 0.4×	9	472
M. Colleen Stainton Australia	13	212 0.5×	276 0.7×	137 1.1×	245 2.1×	81 0.7×	30	718
Anjali J Kaimal United States	18	598 1.5×	673 1.8×	69 0.6×	235 2.0×	69 0.6×	39	848
Samuel S. Kessel United States	9	341 0.9×	142 0.4×	202 1.6×	121 1.0×	78 0.7×	18	604
Ellen L. Tilden United States	17	492 1.2×	566 1.5×	107 0.9×	212 1.8×	49 0.4×	53	757
Carl‐Axel Nilsson Sweden	11	174 0.4×	321 0.9×	83 0.7×	125 1.1×	14 0.1×	19	428
James Nicholson United States	15	776 1.9×	894 2.4×	57 0.5×	301 2.6×	73 0.7×	40	1.1k
Fran Carroll United Kingdom	11	184 0.5×	271 0.7×	72 0.6×	149 1.3×	36 0.3×	24	559
Robert J. Karp United States	10	135 0.3×	133 0.4×	99 0.8×	157 1.3×	24 0.2×	34	434

Countries citing papers authored by M H Hall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M H Hall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M H Hall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M H Hall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M H Hall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M H Hall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M H Hall. The network helps show where M H Hall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M H Hall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M H Hall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M H Hall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M H Hall. M H Hall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Danielian, PJ, et al.. (1996). Long term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ. 312(7044). 1451–1453. 109 indexed citations

2.

Tucker, Janet, M H Hall, Peter Howie, et al.. (1996). Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians. BMJ. 312(7030). 554–559. 80 indexed citations

3.

Miedzybrodzka, Z, M H Hall, Jill Mollison, et al.. (1995). Antenatal screening for carriers of cystic fibrosis: randomised trial of stepwise v couple screening. BMJ. 310(6976). 353–357. 65 indexed citations

4.

Hall, M H, Doris M. Campbell, Cynthia Fraser, & John Lemon. (1989). Mode of delivery and future fertility. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 96(11). 1297–1303. 53 indexed citations

5.

Hall, M H. (1987). When a woman asks for a caesarean section. BMJ. 294(6577). 974–974. 1 indexed citations

6.

Hall, M H & Roy Carr‐Hill. (1982). Impact of sex ratio on onset and management of labour.. BMJ. 285(6339). 401–403. 54 indexed citations

7.

Karp, Laurence E., et al.. (1981). The Premature Breech. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 1(1). 17–17. 1 indexed citations

8.

Hall, M H, et al.. (1980). An audit of antenatal care: the value of the first antenatal visit.. BMJ. 281(6249). 1184–1186. 40 indexed citations

9.

Hall, M H, et al.. (1980). IS ROUTINE ANTENATAL CARE WORTH WHILE?. The Lancet. 316(8185). 78–80. 198 indexed citations

10.

Karp, Laurence E., et al.. (1979). The premature breech: trial of labor or cesarean section?. PubMed. 53(1). 88–92. 44 indexed citations

11.

Hall, M H & Richard J. Davidson. (1968). Prophylactic folic acid in women with pernicious anaemia pregnant after periods of infertility. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 21(5). 599–602. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact