M. Gluck

558 total citations
13 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

M. Gluck is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Gluck has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 5 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in M. Gluck's work include Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). M. Gluck is often cited by papers focused on Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (2 papers). M. Gluck collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Austria and Russia. M. Gluck's co-authors include Robert S. Rempel, Philip C. Elkie, Arthur Rodgers, S. Nilsson, А. Shvidenko, V. Stolbovoi, Tom Moore, Janet Jackson, Ajith H. Perera and S. Quegan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Ecological Indicators and Journal of Wildlife Management.

In The Last Decade

M. Gluck

10 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Gluck Canada 9 174 136 86 61 41 13 316
Sassan Saatchi United States 7 132 0.8× 123 0.9× 153 1.8× 213 3.5× 16 0.4× 15 321
Jake Simpson United Kingdom 6 180 1.0× 160 1.2× 112 1.3× 71 1.2× 10 0.2× 6 352
G. Rajashekar India 12 250 1.4× 230 1.7× 200 2.3× 199 3.3× 27 0.7× 21 449
Luke J. Evans United Kingdom 9 221 1.3× 111 0.8× 69 0.8× 51 0.8× 9 0.2× 11 308
Matthew G. Hethcoat United Kingdom 9 211 1.2× 156 1.1× 75 0.9× 87 1.4× 13 0.3× 17 293
Peter B. Boucher United States 8 116 0.7× 116 0.9× 95 1.1× 95 1.6× 33 0.8× 15 236
Katherine S. Christie United States 6 258 1.5× 42 0.3× 49 0.6× 49 0.8× 30 0.7× 12 346
Alison K. Paulson United States 9 130 0.7× 293 2.2× 141 1.6× 31 0.5× 61 1.5× 14 353
Paige Eagle United States 5 125 0.7× 132 1.0× 65 0.8× 20 0.3× 50 1.2× 9 240
А. С. Исаев Russia 8 216 1.2× 250 1.8× 78 0.9× 55 0.9× 135 3.3× 15 434

Countries citing papers authored by M. Gluck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Gluck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Gluck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Gluck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Gluck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Gluck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Gluck. The network helps show where M. Gluck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Gluck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Gluck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Gluck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Gluck. M. Gluck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Rempel, Robert S., et al.. (2015). An indicator system to assess ecological integrity of managed forests. Ecological Indicators. 60. 860–869. 30 indexed citations
2.
Gluck, M., et al.. (2012). Caribou conservation and recovery in Ontario: development and implementation of the Caribou Conservation Plan. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 32(2). 145–145. 3 indexed citations
3.
Perera, Ajith H., et al.. (2009). Using BFOLDS to characterize fire regimes: a case study from a boreal forest landscape..
4.
Rempel, Robert S., et al.. (2007). Forest Policy Scenario Analysis: Sensitivity of Songbird Community to Changes in Forest Cover Amount and Configuration. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 2(1). 24 indexed citations
5.
Balzter, Heiko, Wolfgang Wagner, David Gaveau, et al.. (2002). Accuracy assessment of a large-scale forest cover map of central Siberia from synthetic aperture radar. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 28(6). 719–737. 27 indexed citations
6.
Nilsson, S. & M. Gluck. (2001). Sustainability and the Canadian forest sector. The Forestry Chronicle. 77(1). 39–47. 9 indexed citations
7.
9.
Obersteiner, Michael, M. Jonas, Staffan Nilsson, А. Shvidenko, & M. Gluck. (2000). Trading Flexibility for Predictability - Differential Emission Dynamics and the Formation of Common Carbon Markets. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis). 1 indexed citations
10.
Gluck, M.. (2000). Financing Medicare's Future. 1 indexed citations
11.
Schmullius, C., W. C. Wagner, Achim Roth, et al.. (1999). SIBERIA-SAR imaging for boreal ecology and radar interferometry applications. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis). 18 indexed citations
12.
Rempel, Robert S., Philip C. Elkie, Arthur Rodgers, & M. Gluck. (1997). Timber-Management and Natural-Disturbance Effects on Moose Habitat: Landscape Evaluation. Journal of Wildlife Management. 61(2). 517–517. 131 indexed citations
13.
Gluck, M. & Robert S. Rempel. (1996). Structural characteristics of post-wildfire and clearcut landscapes. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 39(1-3). 435–450. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026