M. E. KNIGHT

861 total citations
8 papers, 582 citations indexed

About

M. E. KNIGHT is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, M. E. KNIGHT has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 582 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 5 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in M. E. KNIGHT's work include Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). M. E. KNIGHT is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). M. E. KNIGHT collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. M. E. KNIGHT's co-authors include Dave Goulson, A. P. Martin, R. J. Hale, J. L. Osborne, Roy Sanderson, Jonathan S. Ellis, Scott A. Bishop, Ben Darvill, Stephen C. Votier and Claire Carvell and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecular Ecology, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms and Journal of Insect Conservation.

In The Last Decade

M. E. KNIGHT

8 papers receiving 570 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. E. KNIGHT United Kingdom	6	492	387	336	171	72	8	582
Josefina Steiner Germany	15	486 1.0×	279 0.7×	219 0.7×	187 1.1×	55 0.8×	36	545
Stanislav Korenko Czechia	15	414 0.8×	359 0.9×	307 0.9×	68 0.4×	29 0.4×	43	652
Jesús Selfa Spain	13	527 1.1×	407 1.1×	143 0.4×	113 0.7×	30 0.4×	125	638
R. J. Hale New Zealand	8	420 0.9×	397 1.0×	212 0.6×	230 1.3×	66 0.9×	9	529
E. E. Grissell United States	14	511 1.0×	480 1.2×	153 0.5×	154 0.9×	71 1.0×	56	698
Jessica R. Litman Switzerland	10	469 1.0×	165 0.4×	271 0.8×	158 0.9×	58 0.8×	13	516
Timothy C. Lockley United States	7	320 0.7×	383 1.0×	223 0.7×	128 0.7×	64 0.9×	14	612
Veli Vikberg Finland	13	497 1.0×	157 0.4×	180 0.5×	87 0.5×	101 1.4×	56	574
D. Kubisz Poland	15	343 0.7×	291 0.8×	137 0.4×	132 0.8×	56 0.8×	74	592
Bernardo F. Santos United States	12	445 0.9×	240 0.6×	238 0.7×	44 0.3×	32 0.4×	58	575

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. KNIGHT

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. KNIGHT's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. KNIGHT with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. KNIGHT more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. KNIGHT

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. KNIGHT. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. KNIGHT. The network helps show where M. E. KNIGHT may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. E. KNIGHT

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. E. KNIGHT. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. E. KNIGHT based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. E. KNIGHT. M. E. KNIGHT is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Puschendorf, Robert, et al.. (2020). Choice of molecular assay determines ranavirus detection probability and inferences about prevalence and occurrence. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 141. 139–147. 2 indexed citations

Bicknell, Anthony W. J., M. E. KNIGHT, David T. Bilton, et al.. (2012). Population genetic structure and long‐distance dispersal among seabird populations: Implications for colony persistence. Molecular Ecology. 21(12). 2863–2876. 44 indexed citations

Lunt, Paul, et al.. (2012). Biogeographical patterns of variation in Western European populations of the great green bush-cricket (Tettigonia viridissima; Orthoptera Tettigoniidae). Journal of Insect Conservation. 17(3). 431–440. 4 indexed citations

KNIGHT, M. E., J. L. Osborne, Roy Sanderson, et al.. (2009). Bumblebee nest density and the scale of available forage in arable landscapes. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 2(2). 116–124. 87 indexed citations

Ellis, Jonathan S., et al.. (2008). Genetic identification of morphologically cryptic agricultural pests. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 11(1). 115–121. 18 indexed citations

Ellis, Jonathan S., M. E. KNIGHT, Ben Darvill, & Dave Goulson. (2006). Extremely low effective population sizes, genetic structuring and reduced genetic diversity in a threatened bumblebee species, Bombus sylvarum (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Molecular Ecology. 15(14). 4375–4386. 115 indexed citations

Ellis, Jonathan S., M. E. KNIGHT, Claire Carvell, & Dave Goulson. (2006). Cryptic species identification: a simple diagnostic tool for discriminating between two problematic bumblebee species. Molecular Ecology Notes. 6(2). 540–542. 29 indexed citations

KNIGHT, M. E., A. P. Martin, Scott A. Bishop, et al.. (2005). An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Molecular Ecology. 14(6). 1811–1820. 283 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact