M. Deane Bowers
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.1%
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Ecology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Nancy E. StampGillian M. PuttickEric D. FajerLee A. DyerF. A. BazzazSharon K. CollingeTobin J. HammerEvan C. Lampert
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (82 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (58 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (44 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Partner nations
- United StatesArgentinaSweden
In The Last Decade
M. Deane Bowers
131 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.3k
- Plant Science 3.2k
- Insect Science 2.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.1k
- Ecology 933
Countries citing papers authored by M. Deane Bowers
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Deane Bowers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Deane Bowers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Deane Bowers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Deane Bowers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Deane Bowers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Deane Bowers. The network helps show where M. Deane Bowers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Deane Bowers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Deane Bowers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Deane Bowers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Deane Bowers. M. Deane Bowers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 112 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 147 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 76 | |
| 17 | Parasitism of New England Buckmoth caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae) by tachinid flies | 11 |
| 18 | Body temperature, behavior, and growth of early-spring caterpillars (Hemileuca lucina: Saturniidae). | 18 |
| 19 | 162 | |
| 20 | 97 |
About M. Deane Bowers
M. Deane Bowers is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 133 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (82 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (58 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (44 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.3k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.1k citations). M. Deane Bowers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Nancy E. Stamp, Gillian M. Puttick, Eric D. Fajer, Lee A. Dyer, F. A. Bazzaz, Sharon K. Collinge, Tobin J. Hammer, Evan C. Lampert, Carolina Quintero and Fakhri A. Bazzaz. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.