Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of $\vec \gamma$-ray bursts
2007452 citationsP. A. Evans, A. P. Beardmore et al.Astronomy and Astrophysicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Capalbi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Capalbi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Capalbi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Capalbi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Capalbi. The network helps show where M. Capalbi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Capalbi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Capalbi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Capalbi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Capalbi. M. Capalbi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Catalano, O., M. Capalbi, P. Conconi, et al.. (2023). MUCH: A compact imaging Čerenkov telescope for volcano muography. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1056. 168572–168572.
Conforti, Vito, M. Trifoglio, F. Gianotti, et al.. (2017). The Camera Server of the ASTRI SST-2M Telescopes Proposed for the Cherenkov Telescope Array. ASPC. 512. 635.1 indexed citations
7.
Evans, P. A., K. L. Page, J. P. Osborne, et al.. (2013). VizieR Online Data Catalog: 1SXPS Swift X-ray telescope point source catalogue (Evans+ 2014).
8.
Melandri, A., B. Sbarufatti, R. Salvaterra, et al.. (2012). The Dark Bursts population in a complete sample of bright Swift Long Gamma-Ray Bursts.28 indexed citations
Evans, P. A., A. P. Beardmore, K. L. Page, et al.. (2007). An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves of $\vec \gamma$-ray bursts. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 469(1). 379–385.452 indexed citations breakdown →
Krimm, H. A., S. D. Barthelmy, M. Capalbi, et al.. (2005). Swift-BAT discovery of hard X-ray transient SWIFT J1626.6-5156.. GCN. 4361. 1.1 indexed citations
17.
Capalbi, M., M. Perri, P. Romano, et al.. (2005). GRB 050721A: early swift XRT analysis results.. GRB Coordinates Network. 3184. 1.2 indexed citations
18.
Capalbi, M., M. Perri, P. Giommi, et al.. (2005). XRF 050522: swift XRT refined analysis.. GRB Coordinates Network. 3463. 1.1 indexed citations
19.
Capalbi, M., V. Mangano, G. Tagliaferri, et al.. (2005). GRB 050827: XRT possible afterglow detection.. GCN. 3899. 1.1 indexed citations
20.
Frontera, F., M. Orlandini, L. Amati, et al.. (1999). XTE J1859+226. International Astronomical Union Circular. 7291. 2.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.