M. Borsato

29.9k total citations
9 papers, 171 citations indexed

About

M. Borsato is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Borsato has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 171 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 3 papers in Radiation and 1 paper in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in M. Borsato's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (7 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). M. Borsato is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (7 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (7 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers). M. Borsato collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Spain. M. Borsato's co-authors include J. Alimena, A. De Cosa, D. Martínez Santos, Emanuele Bagnaschi, G. Weiglein, M. Citron, A. De Roeck, Keith A. Olive, Matthew J. Dolan and John Ellis and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical review. D, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and The European Physical Journal C.

In The Last Decade

M. Borsato

9 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Borsato United States	6	167	57	13	12	5	9	171
I. Shilon Switzerland	4	65 0.4×	38 0.7×	12 0.9×	6 0.5×	7 1.4×	7	79
Krešimir Kumerički Croatia	15	711 4.3×	34 0.6×	10 0.8×	5 0.4×	4 0.8×	30	727
G. C. Hill United States	6	86 0.5×	44 0.8×	8 0.6×	3 0.3×	5 1.0×	23	116
Selim Çetin Türkiye	8	131 0.8×	30 0.5×	9 0.7×	5 0.4×	17 3.4×	21	150
J. F. de Trocóniz Spain	2	174 1.0×	32 0.6×	5 0.4×	8 0.7×	5 1.0×	2	180
L. Köpke Germany	5	124 0.7×	19 0.3×	7 0.5×	3 0.3×	8 1.6×	7	127
Clarissa Siqueira Brazil	6	136 0.8×	55 1.0×	3 0.2×	9 0.8×	6 1.2×	13	139
M. Khachatryan Italy	7	86 0.5×	54 0.9×	4 0.3×	8 0.7×	9 1.8×	10	94
C. Pérez de los Heros Sweden	5	109 0.7×	41 0.7×	5 0.4×	6 0.5×	6 1.2×	20	126
Ignasi Rosell Spain	11	403 2.4×	29 0.5×	3 0.2×	8 0.7×	8 1.6×	25	406

Countries citing papers authored by M. Borsato

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Borsato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Borsato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Borsato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Borsato

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Borsato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Borsato. The network helps show where M. Borsato may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Borsato

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Borsato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Borsato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Borsato. M. Borsato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Alimena, J., A. De Cosa, & M. Borsato. (2020). Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 66 indexed citations

2.

Borsato, M., V. V. Gligorov, Diego Guadagnoli, D. Martínez Santos, & Olcyr Sumensari. (2019). Effective-field-theory arguments for pursuing lepton-flavor-violating K decays at LHCb. Physical review. D. 99(5). 10 indexed citations

3.

Borsato, M., V. V. Gligorov, Diego Guadagnoli, D. Martínez Santos, & Olcyr Sumensari. (2018). The strange side of LHCb. arXiv (Cornell University). 6 indexed citations

4.

Bagnaschi, Emanuele, M. Borsato, Kazuki Sakurai, et al.. (2017). Likelihood analysis of the minimal AMSB model. The European Physical Journal C. 77(4). 268–268. 21 indexed citations

5.

Bagnaschi, Emanuele, Kodai Sakurai, H. Flächer, et al.. (2017). Likelihood Analysis of the pMSSM11 in Light of LHC 13-TeV Data : arXiv. 1 indexed citations

6.

Bagnaschi, Emanuele, Kazuki Sakurai, M. Borsato, et al.. (2017). Likelihood Analysis of the pMSSM11 in Light of LHC 13-TeV Data. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 51 indexed citations

7.

Dey, B., M. Borsato, N. Arnaud, et al.. (2014). Design and performance of the focusing DIRC detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 775. 112–131. 11 indexed citations

8.

Roberts, Douglas A., N. Arnaud, B. Dey, et al.. (2014). Results from the FDIRC prototype. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 766. 114–117. 3 indexed citations

9.

Borsato, M., N. Arnaud, B. Dey, et al.. (2013). The focusing DIRC: An innovative PID detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 732. 333–337. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact