M. B. Hooker
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Law top 0.5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Accounting top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. LevDavid M. EngelSally Falk MooreNico J.G. KapteinM. C. RicklefsTim LindseyAhmad IbrahimSimon Roberts
- Topics
- Legal Studies and Policies (19 papers)Asian Studies and History (16 papers)Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsIndonesia
In The Last Decade
M. B. Hooker
35 papers receiving 376 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Sociology and Political Science 337
- Political Science and International Relations 224
- Law 200
- Anthropology 82
- Accounting 74
Countries citing papers authored by M. B. Hooker
This map shows the geographic impact of M. B. Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. B. Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. B. Hooker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. B. Hooker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. B. Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. B. Hooker. The network helps show where M. B. Hooker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. B. Hooker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. B. Hooker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. B. Hooker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. B. Hooker. M. B. Hooker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Succession to Muslim Estates in Singapore: Sources of Law and Choice of Law | 1 |
| 2 | Essay: Maria Was a Christian - Nadra Was a Muslim: Hertogh Revisited | 1 |
| 3 | Introduction: Islamic Law in South-East Asia | 17 |
| 4 | Native Title in Malaysia Continued - Nor's Case | 2 |
| 5 | Law and the Chinese in Southeast Asia | 9 |
| 6 | 'Native Title' in Malaysia: Adong's Case | 5 |
| 7 | Chinese Customary Law in Contemporary Malaysia and Singapore | 0 |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | The pre-modern texts | 1 |
| 11 | Malaysian legal essays : a collection of essays in honour of Professor Emeritus Datuk Ahmad Ibrahim | 1 |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 54 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About M. B. Hooker
M. B. Hooker is a scholar working on Law, Accounting and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 38 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Studies and Policies (19 papers), Asian Studies and History (16 papers) and Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (200 citations), Political Science and International Relations (224 citations) and Anthropology (82 citations). M. B. Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Lev, David M. Engel, Sally Falk Moore, Nico J.G. Kaptein, M. C. Ricklefs, Tim Lindsey, Ahmad Ibrahim and Simon Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, The Journal of Asian Studies and American Journal of Legal History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.