M. A. Shpot

730 total citations
28 papers, 490 citations indexed

About

M. A. Shpot is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Mathematical Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. A. Shpot has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 490 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 12 papers in Mathematical Physics and 10 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. A. Shpot's work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (17 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (11 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers). M. A. Shpot is often cited by papers focused on Theoretical and Computational Physics (17 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (11 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers). M. A. Shpot collaborates with scholars based in Ukraine, Germany and Russia. M. A. Shpot's co-authors include H. W. Diehl, Yurij Holovatch, C. Bervillier, H. M. Srivastava, Tobias Hansen, R. K. P. Zia, Yu. M. Pis’mak, Chin‐Kun Hu, S. B. Rutkevich and R. B. Paris and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

In The Last Decade

M. A. Shpot

26 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. A. Shpot Ukraine	13	325	206	135	119	106	28	490
Adriaan M. J. Schakel Germany	13	287 0.9×	309 1.5×	78 0.6×	76 0.6×	118 1.1×	32	508
Yichul Choi United States	12	148 0.5×	339 1.6×	192 1.4×	72 0.6×	240 2.3×	14	942
Shuang Tang United States	14	139 0.4×	232 1.1×	207 1.5×	44 0.4×	210 2.0×	31	593
Johannes Hager Germany	8	199 0.6×	58 0.3×	95 0.7×	116 1.0×	70 0.7×	18	334
Kiyonori Gomi Japan	10	253 0.8×	534 2.6×	170 1.3×	77 0.6×	43 0.4×	35	623
Román Salvador United States	12	500 1.5×	177 0.9×	66 0.5×	123 1.0×	97 0.9×	17	579
J. D. Kimel United States	11	199 0.6×	146 0.7×	66 0.5×	48 0.4×	92 0.9×	31	546
J. C. Xavier Brazil	15	474 1.5×	442 2.1×	57 0.4×	29 0.2×	139 1.3×	35	677
Douglas Ritchie Canada	9	404 1.2×	354 1.7×	130 1.0×	79 0.7×	82 0.8×	14	635
C.S. Hsue Taiwan	8	79 0.2×	151 0.7×	85 0.6×	16 0.1×	45 0.4×	27	413

Countries citing papers authored by M. A. Shpot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. A. Shpot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. A. Shpot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. A. Shpot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. A. Shpot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. A. Shpot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. A. Shpot. The network helps show where M. A. Shpot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. A. Shpot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. A. Shpot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. A. Shpot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. A. Shpot. M. A. Shpot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Paris, R. B. & M. A. Shpot. (2018). A Feynman integral in Lifshitz-point and Lorentz-violating theories in RD ⨁ Rm. Abertay Research Portal (Abertay University). 1 indexed citations

Srivastava, H. M. & M. A. Shpot. (2017). Reduction and transformation formulas for the Appell and related functions in two variables. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences. 40(11). 4102–4108. 1 indexed citations

Shpot, M. A. & Tibor K. Pogány. (2016). The Feynman integral in ℝ¹⊕ ℝ^mand complex expansion of₂F₁. Integral Transforms and Special Functions. 27(7). 533–547. 1 indexed citations

Shpot, M. A. & H. M. Srivastava. (2015). The Clausenian hypergeometric function3F2with unit argument and negative integral parameter differences. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 259. 819–827. 12 indexed citations

Shpot, M. A.. (2010). Two-loop RG functions of the massive $\phi^4$ field theory in general dimensions. Condensed Matter Physics. 13(1). 13101–13101.

Rutkevich, S. B., H. W. Diehl, & M. A. Shpot. (2010). On conjectured local generalizations of anisotropic scale invariance and their implications. Nuclear Physics B. 843(1). 255–301. 6 indexed citations

Diehl, H. W., M. A. Shpot, & П. В. Прудников. (2006). Boundary critical behaviour atm-axial Lifshitz points of semi-infinite systems with a surface plane perpendicular to a modulation axis. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 39(25). 7927–7942. 4 indexed citations

Diehl, H. W., et al.. (2006). Fluctuation-induced forces in periodic slabs: Breakdown of epsilon expansion at the bulk critical point and revised field theory. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 75(2). 241–247. 37 indexed citations

Diehl, H. W., M. A. Shpot, & R. K. P. Zia. (2003). Relevance of space anisotropy in the critical behavior ofm-axial Lifshitz points. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 68(22). 10 indexed citations

10.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (2003). Comment on “Renormalization-group picture of the Lifshitz critical behavior”. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 68(6). 6 indexed citations

11.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (2002). Critical, crossover and correction-to-scaling exponents for isotropic Lifshitz points to order (8 $ndash$ d)2. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 35(30). 6249–6259. 16 indexed citations

12.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (2001). Critical behavior at m-axial Lifshitz points: field-theory analysis and ∊-expansion results. APS. 6 indexed citations

13.

Shpot, M. A., et al.. (2001). Surface critical behavior of random systems: Ordinary transition. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 63(5). 56102–56102. 9 indexed citations

14.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (2001). Liftshitz-point critical behaviour to O(ϵ²). Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 34(42). 9101–9105. 12 indexed citations

15.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (2000). Critical behavior atm-axial Lifshitz points: Field-theory analysis and ε-expansion results. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 62(18). 12338–12349. 50 indexed citations

16.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (1998). Massive field-theory approach to surface critical behavior in three-dimensional systems. Nuclear Physics B. 528(3). 595–647. 91 indexed citations

17.

Shpot, M. A.. (1997). SPECIAL SURFACE TRANSITION: MASSIVE FIELD THEORY AND CRITICAL EXPONENTS IN THREE DIMENSIONS. Condensed Matter Physics. 143–143. 6 indexed citations

18.

Diehl, H. W. & M. A. Shpot. (1994). Surface Critical Behavior in Fixed Dimensionsd<4: Nonanalyticity of Critical Surface Enhancement and Massive Field Theory Approach. Physical Review Letters. 73(25). 3431–3434. 38 indexed citations

19.

Holovatch, Yurij & M. A. Shpot. (1992). Critical exponents of random Ising-like systems in general dimensions. Journal of Statistical Physics. 66(3-4). 867–883. 24 indexed citations

20.

Shpot, M. A.. (1989). Critical behavior of the mn-component field model in three dimensions II. Three-loop results. Physics Letters A. 142(8-9). 474–478. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact