Lysbeth Floden

33 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Lysbeth Floden
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Pharmacology 75
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 30
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 13
Replace Kristen R. Weaver with:
Kristen R. Weaver United States
Louise Sweeney United Kingdom
James E. Hewett United States
Jeanne Walter United States
Anna Kurowska Poland
Sara Reina‐Gutiérrez Spain
Shanshan Qin United States
Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska Brazil
Gee Su Yang United States
Mary Baker United Kingdom
Lysbeth Floden relative to Kristen R. Weaver United States Kristen R. Weaver's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Kristen R. Weaver · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lysbeth Floden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lysbeth Floden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lysbeth Floden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lysbeth Floden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lysbeth Floden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lysbeth Floden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lysbeth Floden. The network helps show where Lysbeth Floden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lysbeth Floden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lysbeth Floden Line = papers co-authored together Lysbeth Floden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202045
2 201741
3 202026
4 201021
5 202020
6 201920
7 201520
8 201016
9 201915
10 201313
11 202312
12 20159
13 20228
14 20147
15 20157
16 20185
17 20175
18 20165
19 20184
20 20223

About Lysbeth Floden

Lysbeth Floden is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Complementary and alternative medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (6 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (5 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (4 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Pharmacology (75 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (30 citations), Applied Psychology (17 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (13 citations). Lysbeth Floden has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Myra Muramoto, Melanie L. Bell, Eva Matthews, Stacie Hudgens, Jaskaran Singh, Amy Howerter, Vanina Popova, Kimberly Cooper, Carol Jamieson and Wayne C. Drevets. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Value in Health, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and CNS Spectrums.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact