Lynne Yong
About
In The Last Decade
Lynne Yong
5 papers receiving 826 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Clinical Psychology 796
- Psychiatry and Mental health 243
- Philosophy 111
- Social Psychology 110
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Countries citing papers authored by Lynne Yong
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynne Yong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynne Yong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynne Yong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lynne Yong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynne Yong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynne Yong. The network helps show where Lynne Yong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynne Yong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynne Yong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynne Yong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynne Yong. Lynne Yong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 70 | |
| 4 | 242 | |
| 5 | Reported pathological childhood experiences associated with the development of borderline personality disorder breakdown → | 520 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.