Lynn D’eer

568 total citations
9 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

Lynn D’eer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Lynn D’eer has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Lynn D’eer's work include Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (8 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers) and Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (2 papers). Lynn D’eer is often cited by papers focused on Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (8 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (3 papers) and Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (2 papers). Lynn D’eer collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and Netherlands. Lynn D’eer's co-authors include Chris Cornelis, Lluı́s Godo, Nele Verbiest, Mauricio Restrepo, Jonatan Gómez, Yvan Saeys, Sarah Vluymans, Daniel Sánchez and Kevin Mets and has published in prestigious journals such as Information Sciences, Fuzzy Sets and Systems and International Journal of Approximate Reasoning.

In The Last Decade

Lynn D’eer

8 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lynn D’eer Belgium	7	413	198	144	126	34	9	432
Xiaoli He China	9	317 0.8×	106 0.5×	132 0.9×	127 1.0×	41 1.2×	26	347
El-Sayed A. Abo-Tabl Egypt	12	321 0.8×	207 1.0×	65 0.5×	69 0.5×	35 1.0×	27	378
Zbigniew Bonikowski Poland	3	421 1.0×	103 0.5×	144 1.0×	133 1.1×	49 1.4×	4	431
Edward Bryniarski Poland	3	489 1.2×	106 0.5×	184 1.3×	153 1.2×	61 1.8×	4	497
Zhehuang Huang China	10	301 0.7×	89 0.4×	159 1.1×	164 1.3×	82 2.4×	22	367
Ming-Wen Shao China	7	408 1.0×	79 0.4×	231 1.6×	242 1.9×	53 1.6×	13	438
Shaoyong Li China	7	308 0.7×	76 0.4×	110 0.8×	206 1.6×	20 0.6×	15	319
Eloísa Ramírez‐Poussa Spain	11	343 0.8×	137 0.7×	132 0.9×	111 0.9×	18 0.5×	35	365
W. Żakowski Poland	2	279 0.7×	60 0.3×	110 0.8×	98 0.8×	36 1.1×	6	287

Countries citing papers authored by Lynn D’eer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn D’eer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn D’eer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn D’eer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn D’eer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn D’eer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn D’eer. The network helps show where Lynn D’eer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lynn D’eer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lynn D’eer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lynn D’eer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lynn D’eer. Lynn D’eer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

D’eer, Lynn, et al.. (2023). Towards graph-based forecasting with attention for real-world restaurant sales. 33. 560–569.

2.

D’eer, Lynn & Chris Cornelis. (2019). Decision reducts and bireducts in a covering approximation space and their relationship to set definability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 109. 42–54. 6 indexed citations

3.

D’eer, Lynn & Chris Cornelis. (2017). Notes on covering-based rough sets from topological point of view: Relationships with general framework of dual approximation operators. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 88. 295–305. 9 indexed citations

4.

D’eer, Lynn & Chris Cornelis. (2017). A comprehensive study of fuzzy covering-based rough set models: Definitions, properties and interrelationships. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 336. 1–26. 83 indexed citations

5.

D’eer, Lynn, Chris Cornelis, & Lluı́s Godo. (2016). Fuzzy neighborhood operators based on fuzzy coverings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 312. 17–35. 119 indexed citations

6.

Vluymans, Sarah, Lynn D’eer, Yvan Saeys, & Chris Cornelis. (2015). Applications of Fuzzy Rough Set Theory in Machine Learning: a Survey. Fundamenta Informaticae. 142(1-4). 53–86. 42 indexed citations

7.

D’eer, Lynn, Mauricio Restrepo, Chris Cornelis, & Jonatan Gómez. (2015). Neighborhood operators for covering-based rough sets. Information Sciences. 336. 21–44. 84 indexed citations

8.

D’eer, Lynn, Chris Cornelis, & Daniel Sánchez. (2015). Fuzzy Covering based Rough Sets Revisited. Advances in intelligent systems research. 4 indexed citations

9.

D’eer, Lynn, Nele Verbiest, Chris Cornelis, & Lluı́s Godo. (2014). A comprehensive study of implicator–conjunctor-based and noise-tolerant fuzzy rough sets: Definitions, properties and robustness analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 275. 1–38. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact