Lynda Appleton

16 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Lynda Appleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Oncology 142
  • General Health Professions 127
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 133
  • Applied Psychology 17
Replace Heather J. Campbell‐Enns with:
Heather J. Campbell‐Enns Canada
Sue‐Ann Carmont Australia
Sandra Ieropoli Australia
Barbara Swore Fletcher United States
Phil Cotterell United Kingdom
Tara Schapmire United States
Su Kyung Song South Korea
Anne Nicolaisen Denmark
Laura Sundstrom United States
Janneke van Roij Netherlands
Lynda Appleton relative to Heather J. Campbell‐Enns Canada Heather J. Campbell‐Enns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Heather J. Campbell‐Enns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynda Appleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynda Appleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynda Appleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynda Appleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynda Appleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynda Appleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynda Appleton. The network helps show where Lynda Appleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lynda Appleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynda Appleton Line = papers co-authored together Lynda Appleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201784
2 201443
3 200640
4 201333
5 201433
6 201826
7 202020
8 201319
9 201718
10 202015
11 202014
12 201010
13 20233
14 20173
15 20103
16
Cancer and seeking normality: a longitudinal, qualitative study to explore how patients with advanced cancer and their carers cope and maintain psychological wellbeing
20131

About Lynda Appleton

Lynda Appleton is a scholar working on Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (7 papers), Family Support in Illness (6 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (142 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (133 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Lynda Appleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mari Lloyd‐Williams, Catherine Walshe, Gunn Grande, Diane Roberts, Lynn Calman, Christine Wall, Maria Flynn, Helen Poole, Julie Repper and Fiona Irvine. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Oncology Nursing, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMJ Open and Journal of Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact