Lyn Ebert

1.5k total citations
40 papers, 992 citations indexed

About

Lyn Ebert is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Lyn Ebert has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 992 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Lyn Ebert's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (10 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers). Lyn Ebert is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (10 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (7 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (7 papers). Lyn Ebert collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and Singapore. Lyn Ebert's co-authors include Sally Wai‐Chi Chan, Shanna Fealy, Jiemin Zhu, Maralyn Foureur, Kathleen Fahy, Donovan Jones, Rachael Taylor, Alessandra Bisquera, John Attia and Alexis Hure and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, BMC Cancer and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

In The Last Decade

Lyn Ebert

39 papers receiving 959 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lyn Ebert Australia 17 312 277 274 229 148 40 992
Jason Fletcher United States 20 323 1.0× 376 1.4× 90 0.3× 145 0.6× 154 1.0× 83 1.2k
Shahnaz Kohan Iran 16 281 0.9× 251 0.9× 117 0.4× 231 1.0× 121 0.8× 113 836
Annsofie Adolfsson Sweden 19 295 0.9× 224 0.8× 204 0.7× 199 0.9× 397 2.7× 70 1.1k
Christine Furber United Kingdom 18 486 1.6× 366 1.3× 302 1.1× 193 0.8× 280 1.9× 50 1.3k
Natalie Henrich United States 19 672 2.2× 508 1.8× 83 0.3× 263 1.1× 157 1.1× 57 1.4k
Inaam Khalaf Jordan 17 259 0.8× 276 1.0× 149 0.5× 230 1.0× 332 2.2× 55 972
Jill Shawe United Kingdom 22 626 2.0× 424 1.5× 502 1.8× 483 2.1× 124 0.8× 103 1.5k
Deborah McLeod Canada 23 362 1.2× 352 1.3× 57 0.2× 230 1.0× 146 1.0× 69 1.3k
Zohreh Shahhosseini Iran 16 323 1.0× 313 1.1× 146 0.5× 190 0.8× 275 1.9× 124 942
Deborah Oakley United States 23 688 2.2× 502 1.8× 302 1.1× 401 1.8× 159 1.1× 66 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Lyn Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lyn Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyn Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyn Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lyn Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyn Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyn Ebert. The network helps show where Lyn Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lyn Ebert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lyn Ebert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lyn Ebert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lyn Ebert. Lyn Ebert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ebert, Lyn, Debbie Massey, Tracy Flenady, et al.. (2022). Midwives’ recognition and response to maternal deterioration: A national cross‐sectional study. Birth. 50(2). 438–448. 3 indexed citations
3.
Cummins, Allison, et al.. (2022). Heutagogy: A self-determined learning approach for Midwifery Continuity of Care experiences. Nurse Education in Practice. 60. 103329–103329. 9 indexed citations
4.
Ebert, Lyn, et al.. (2020). Australian Midwives' Recognition of and Response to Maternal Deterioration: A Literature Review. International Journal of Childbirth. 10(2). 92–103. 3 indexed citations
5.
Ebert, Lyn, et al.. (2020). Neonatal resuscitation training for midwives in Australia: A discussion of current practice. Women and Birth. 33(6). e505–e510. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ebert, Lyn, et al.. (2020). Students together with academics ensures retention and success: The STARS project. Nurse Education Today. 97. 104723–104723. 1 indexed citations
7.
Chan, Sally Wai‐Chi, Lyn Ebert, Olivia Wynne, et al.. (2020). Impact of Perinatal Depression and Anxiety on Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Data Analysis. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 24(6). 718–726. 72 indexed citations
8.
Fealy, Shanna, Sally Wai‐Chi Chan, Olivia Wynne, et al.. (2019). The Support for New Mums Project: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial designed to test a postnatal psychoeducation smartphone application. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 75(6). 1347–1359. 14 indexed citations
9.
Sweet, Linda, Julie‐Anne Fleet, Terri Downer, et al.. (2019). Development and validation of the Australian Midwifery Standards Assessment Tool (AMSAT) to the Australian Midwife Standards for Practice 2018. Women and Birth. 33(2). 135–144. 8 indexed citations
11.
Zhu, Jiemin, Lyn Ebert, Xiangyu Liu, Di Wei, & Sally Wai‐Chi Chan. (2018). Mobile Breast Cancer e-Support Program for Chinese Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy (Part 2): Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 6(4). e104–e104. 89 indexed citations
12.
Zhu, Jiemin, Lyn Ebert, & Sally Wai‐Chi Chan. (2017). Integrative Review on the Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interactive Programs for Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Treatment.. PubMed. 44(2). E42–E54. 23 indexed citations
13.
Fealy, Shanna, Rachael Taylor, Maralyn Foureur, et al.. (2017). Weighing as a stand-alone intervention does not reduce excessive gestational weight gain compared to routine antenatal care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 17(1). 36–36. 29 indexed citations
14.
Ebert, Lyn, et al.. (2016). An evaluation of perinatal mental health interventions: An integrative literature review. Women and Birth. 29(5). 399–406. 34 indexed citations
15.
Sweet, Linda, et al.. (2016). The Continuity of Care Experience in Australian midwifery education—What have we achieved?. Women and Birth. 30(3). 200–205. 31 indexed citations
16.
Ebert, Lyn, et al.. (2015). Learning to be a midwife in the clinical environment; tasks, clinical practicum hours or midwifery relationships. Nurse Education in Practice. 16(1). 294–297. 33 indexed citations
17.
Ebert, Lyn, Kerry Hoffman, Tracy Levett‐Jones, & Conor Gilligan. (2014). “They have no idea of what we do or what we know”: Australian graduates' perceptions of working in a health care team. Nurse Education in Practice. 14(5). 544–550. 48 indexed citations
18.
Ebert, Lyn, Alison Ferguson, & Helen Bellchambers. (2010). Working for socially disadvantaged women. Women and Birth. 24(2). 85–91. 8 indexed citations
19.
Ebert, Lyn, Pamela van der Riet, & Kathleen Fahy. (2008). What do midwives need to understand/know about smoking in pregnancy?. Women and Birth. 22(1). 35–40. 19 indexed citations
20.
Ebert, Lyn & Kathleen Fahy. (2007). Why do women continue to smoke in pregnancy?. Women and Birth. 20(4). 161–168. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026