Lydia Dean
About
In The Last Decade
Lydia Dean
4 papers receiving 221 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Clinical Psychology 160
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
- Social Psychology 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 45
- Applied Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Lydia Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Lydia Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lydia Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lydia Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lydia Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lydia Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lydia Dean. The network helps show where Lydia Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lydia Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lydia Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lydia Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lydia Dean. Lydia Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | Mindfulness-based programmes for mental health promotion in adults in nonclinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials breakdown → | 160 |
| 5 | 21 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.