Luke Scheuer

447 citations
19 papers · 210 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Scheuer

16 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Luke Scheuer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 23
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 56
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 27
  • Clinical Psychology 34
Replace Elizabeth Grinspoon with:
Elizabeth Grinspoon United States
Hesun Erin Kim South Korea
Eliza Passell United States
Roger W. Strong United States
Enitan T. Marcelle United States
Michael von Glischinski Germany
Tokiko Yoshida Japan
Sara Laureen Bartels Netherlands
Rowan Diamond United Kingdom
Shifali Singh United States
Luke Scheuer relative to Elizabeth Grinspoon United States Elizabeth Grinspoon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elizabeth Grinspoon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Scheuer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Scheuer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Scheuer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Scheuer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Scheuer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Scheuer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Scheuer. The network helps show where Luke Scheuer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Scheuer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Scheuer Line = papers co-authored together Luke Scheuer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 202141
2 202138
3 202131
4 201925
5 202213
6 202212
7 202211
8 202011
9 20207
10 20225
11 20235
12 20203
13 20193
14 20222
15 20152
16 20191
17 20250
18 20260
19 20210

About Luke Scheuer

Luke Scheuer is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (23 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (56 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (27 citations) and Clinical Psychology (34 citations). Luke Scheuer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Laura Germine, Eliza Passell, Lauren A. Rutter, Roger W. Strong, John Torous, Elizabeth Grinspoon, Paolo Martini, Xiaoshu Zhu, Todd S. Horowitz and Grace C. Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Assessment, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology and Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact