Luke Campbell

782 total citations
18 papers, 646 citations indexed

About

Luke Campbell is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Campbell has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 646 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Sensory Systems and 7 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Luke Campbell's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (7 papers). Luke Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (17 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (7 papers). Luke Campbell collaborates with scholars based in Australia, South Korea and Denmark. Luke Campbell's co-authors include Stephen O’Leary, David Sly, Robert Briggs, Hayden Eastwood, Christofer Bester, Claire Iseli, Benjamin Wei, Amy Hampson, Scott Chambers and Aaron Uschakov and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, The Laryngoscope and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Luke Campbell

18 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Luke Campbell Australia	13	516	486	147	123	93	18	646
Deborah J. Colesa United States	15	536 1.0×	523 1.1×	185 1.3×	95 0.8×	52 0.6×	20	647
Ernst Dalhoff Germany	15	347 0.7×	328 0.7×	66 0.4×	74 0.6×	247 2.7×	59	556
Daniel Schurzig Germany	14	482 0.9×	332 0.7×	126 0.9×	89 0.7×	182 2.0×	34	592
Frank Risi Australia	16	691 1.3×	588 1.2×	127 0.9×	79 0.6×	289 3.1×	24	831
Christofer Bester Australia	16	546 1.1×	496 1.0×	169 1.1×	33 0.3×	75 0.8×	37	584
Adrian Dalbert Switzerland	12	436 0.8×	383 0.8×	138 0.9×	56 0.5×	138 1.5×	37	513
I. J. Hochmair-Desoyer Austria	14	674 1.3×	289 0.6×	163 1.1×	121 1.0×	108 1.2×	35	824
Marc H. Unkelbach Germany	8	550 1.1×	450 0.9×	119 0.8×	46 0.4×	264 2.8×	10	624
Ingeborg Hochmair Austria	11	437 0.8×	321 0.7×	176 1.2×	82 0.7×	77 0.8×	22	524
Michael Tykocinski Australia	16	1.1k 2.1×	797 1.6×	219 1.5×	189 1.5×	328 3.5×	38	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Campbell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Campbell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Campbell. The network helps show where Luke Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Campbell. Luke Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Campbell, Luke, Amy Hampson, Scott Chambers, et al.. (2021). The Effect of Different Round Window Sealants on Cochlear Mechanics Over Time. Otology & Neurotology. 42(8). 1253–1260. 1 indexed citations

Bester, Christofer, Aaron M. Collins, Chanan Shaul, et al.. (2020). Four-point impedance as a biomarker for bleeding during cochlear implantation. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 2777–2777. 38 indexed citations

Campbell, Luke, et al.. (2018). Co-registration of cone beam CT and preoperative MRI for improved accuracy of electrode localization following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants International. 19(3). 147–152. 8 indexed citations

Choi, June, Luke Campbell, Christofer Bester, et al.. (2017). Electrode Impedance Fluctuations as a Biomarker for Inner Ear Pathology After Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 38(10). 1433–1439. 42 indexed citations

Bester, Christofer, et al.. (2017). Characterizing Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Low-Frequency Hearing. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 11. 141–141. 35 indexed citations

Campbell, Luke, Christofer Bester, Claire Iseli, et al.. (2017). Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Audiology and Neurotology. 22(3). 180–189. 32 indexed citations

Campbell, Luke, et al.. (2017). Effect of cochlear implantation on middle ear function: A three‐month prospective study. The Laryngoscope. 128(5). 1207–1212. 8 indexed citations

Wijewickrema, Sudanthi, et al.. (2017). Defining the Hook Region Anatomy of the Guinea Pig Cochlea for Modeling of Inner Ear Surgery. Otology & Neurotology. 38(6). e179–e187. 10 indexed citations

Campbell, Luke, et al.. (2017). The Role of Preoperative Steroids in Atraumatic Cochlear Implantation Surgery. Otology & Neurotology. 38(8). 1118–1124. 22 indexed citations

10.

Allardyce, Benjamin J., Rangam Rajkhowa, Rodney J. Dilley, et al.. (2016). Comparative acoustic performance and mechanical properties of silk membranes for the repair of chronic tympanic membrane perforations. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 64. 65–74. 21 indexed citations

11.

Sly, David, et al.. (2016). Applying Neurotrophins to the Round Window Rescues Auditory Function and Reduces Inner Hair Cell Synaptopathy After Noise-induced Hearing Loss. Otology & Neurotology. 37(9). 1223–1230. 67 indexed citations

12.

Campbell, Luke, David Sly, Claire Iseli, et al.. (2016). Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation. Otology & Neurotology. 37(4). 332–338. 95 indexed citations

13.

Risi, Frank, et al.. (2016). The Effect of Scala Tympani Morphology on Basilar Membrane Contact With a Straight Electrode Array: A Human Temporal Bone Study. Otology & Neurotology. 38(1). 47–53. 21 indexed citations

14.

Eastwood, Hayden, Amy Hampson, Luke Campbell, et al.. (2015). Endolymphatic hydrops is prevalent in the first weeks following cochlear implantation. Hearing Research. 327. 48–57. 37 indexed citations

15.

Jang, Jongmoon, Jangwoo Lee, David Sly, et al.. (2015). A microelectromechanical system artificial basilar membrane based on a piezoelectric cantilever array and its characterization using an animal model. Scientific Reports. 5(1). 87 indexed citations

16.

Rowe, David, Scott Chambers, Amy Hampson, et al.. (2015). Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy. Hearing Research. 333. 49–57. 23 indexed citations

17.

Campbell, Luke, et al.. (2014). Cochlear Response Telemetry. Otology & Neurotology. 36(3). 399–405. 89 indexed citations

18.

Campbell, Luke, David Sly, & Stephen O’Leary. (2012). Prediction and control of neural responses to pulsatile electrical stimulation. Journal of Neural Engineering. 9(2). 26023–26023. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact