David Sly
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 14
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 13
- Co-authors
- Stephen O’Leary (13 shared papers)Brian J. Oldfield (5 shared papers)Luke Campbell (5 shared papers)Hayden Eastwood (3 shared papers)Andrew Chang (3 shared papers)Rachael T. Richardson (3 shared papers)W. Parker Frisbie (1 shared paper)Frank D. Bean (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Hearing Research (4 papers)Otology & Neurotology (2 papers)Audiology and Neurotology (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Neurophysiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
David Sly
36 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Sensory Systems 534
- Cognitive Neuroscience 597
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 193
- Speech and Hearing 133
- Otorhinolaryngology 79
Countries citing papers authored by David Sly
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Sly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sly. The network helps show where David Sly may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Sly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 4 | 1979 | 87 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 83 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 79 | |
| 7 | 1989 | 74 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 67 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 64 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 49 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 34 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 32 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 19 |
About David Sly
David Sly is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Social Psychology, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers) and Infant Health and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (534 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (597 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (193 citations), Speech and Hearing (133 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (79 citations). David Sly has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Stephen O’Leary, Brian J. Oldfield, Luke Campbell, Hayden Eastwood, Andrew Chang, Rachael T. Richardson, W. Parker Frisbie, Frank D. Bean, L.M Colvill and David James. Their work appears in journals such as Hearing Research, Otology & Neurotology, Audiology and Neurotology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Neurophysiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.