Lukáš Spitzer
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Botany and Plant Ecology Studies 14
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 3
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 12
- Co-authors
- Robert Tropek (7 shared papers)Martin Konvička (10 shared papers)Martin Hejda (3 shared papers)Tomáš Kadlec (3 shared papers)Jiří Beneš (16 shared papers)Ivan Hadrián Tuf (2 shared papers)Petr Baňař (2 shared papers)Petr Kočárek (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Ecological Engineering (2 papers)Journal of Applied Entomology (2 papers)Insect Science (1 paper)Oikos (1 paper)Journal of Biogeography (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Lukáš Spitzer
32 papers receiving 689 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 346
- Ecological Modeling 80
- Insect Science 210
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 284
- Ecology 252
Countries citing papers authored by Lukáš Spitzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Lukáš Spitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukáš Spitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukáš Spitzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lukáš Spitzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukáš Spitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukáš Spitzer. The network helps show where Lukáš Spitzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukáš Spitzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 222 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 118 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 3 |
About Lukáš Spitzer
Lukáš Spitzer is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (14 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (11 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (5 papers) and Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (346 citations), Ecological Modeling (80 citations), Insect Science (210 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (284 citations) and Ecology (252 citations). Lukáš Spitzer has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Robert Tropek, Martin Konvička, Martin Hejda, Tomáš Kadlec, Jiří Beneš, Ivan Hadrián Tuf, Petr Baňař, Petr Kočárek, Igor Malenovský and Jiří Skuhrovec. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Engineering, Journal of Applied Entomology, Insect Science, Oikos and Journal of Biogeography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.