Lukas Krämer

14 papers receiving 191 citations

Peers

Lukas Krämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Computational Mathematics 9
  • Hardware and Architecture 33
  • Numerical Analysis 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 73
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 82
Replace Andreas M. Heinecke with:
Andreas M. Heinecke United States
Mathias Jacquelin United States
Hasan M. Nayfeh United States
Brice Videau France
Masashi Iwasaki Japan
Yu Tong United States
Erika Ye United States
Alexey Galda United States
Elica Kyoseva Bulgaria
Xiaogang Qiang China
Lukas Krämer relative to Andreas M. Heinecke United States Andreas M. Heinecke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Andreas M. Heinecke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukas Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukas Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukas Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukas Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukas Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukas Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukas Krämer. The network helps show where Lukas Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Lukas Krämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukas Krämer Line = papers co-authored together Lukas Krämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2011128
2 201222
3 201112
4 20159
5 20197
6 20206
7 20176
8 20115
9 20143
10 20192
11
Don't get stuck in complexity: Coping with strategic complexity in the context of Product Generation Engineering
20162
12
Integration based solvers for standard and generalized Hermitian eigenvalue problems
20181
13 20171
14 20191
15 20180

About Lukas Krämer

Lukas Krämer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Hardware and Architecture, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (9 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (5 papers), Graphene research and applications (4 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (2 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (1 paper), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (1 paper) and Design Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (9 citations), Hardware and Architecture (33 citations), Numerical Analysis (26 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (73 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (82 citations). Lukas Krämer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Lang, Thomas Huckle, Hans‐Joachim Bungartz, R. Johanni, Volker Blüm, Hermann Lederer, Edoardo Di Napoli, Paolo Bientinesi, Gert Witvoet and Jonas Thies. Their work appears in journals such as Parallel Computing, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, Journal of Computational Science, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics and ETNA - Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026