Lukáš Bílek
Impact in
-
- Forest ecology and management
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Insect Science top 2%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Forest ecology and management 37
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 26
- Co-authors
- Zdeněk Vacek (31 shared papers)Stanislav Vacek (30 shared papers)Jiří Remeš (21 shared papers)Daniel Bulušek (14 shared papers)D. Zahradník (6 shared papers)Jan Král (8 shared papers)Ivo Králíček (5 shared papers)Jan Cukor (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Forests (6 papers)Trees (4 papers)Journal of Forest Science (14 papers)Mountain Research and Development (1 paper)Silva Fennica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaSlovakiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lukáš Bílek
47 papers receiving 902 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 669
- Insect Science 284
- Global and Planetary Change 347
- Atmospheric Science 262
- Plant Science 262
Countries citing papers authored by Lukáš Bílek
This map shows the geographic impact of Lukáš Bílek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukáš Bílek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukáš Bílek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lukáš Bílek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukáš Bílek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukáš Bílek. The network helps show where Lukáš Bílek may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lukáš Bílek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 19 |
About Lukáš Bílek
Lukáš Bílek is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (37 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (26 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (22 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (11 papers), Tree Root and Stability Studies (7 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (669 citations), Insect Science (284 citations), Global and Planetary Change (347 citations), Atmospheric Science (262 citations) and Plant Science (262 citations). Lukáš Bílek has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Slovakia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Zdeněk Vacek, Stanislav Vacek, Jiří Remeš, Daniel Bulušek, D. Zahradník, Jan Král, Ivo Králíček, Jan Cukor, Igor Štefančík and Ram P. Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Forests, Trees, Journal of Forest Science, Mountain Research and Development and Silva Fennica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.