Luigi Insabato

7.8k citations
222 papers · 5.6k · h-index 43

Impact in

Papers in

Luigi Insabato

216 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Peers

Luigi Insabato
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.0k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.5k
  • Cancer Research 884
  • Gastroenterology 271
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 665
Replace Teiichi Motoyama with:
Teiichi Motoyama Japan
Russell Vang United States
Carla Rabitti Italy
Antonio Gil‐Moreno Spain
Francisco Vega United States
Dietmar Schmidt Germany
Peter Petrow Germany
Míriam Cuatrecasas Spain
Joseph T. Rabban United States
Michael T. Deavers United States
Luigi Insabato relative to Teiichi Motoyama Japan Teiichi Motoyama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Teiichi Motoyama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luigi Insabato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luigi Insabato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luigi Insabato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luigi Insabato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luigi Insabato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luigi Insabato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luigi Insabato. The network helps show where Luigi Insabato may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luigi Insabato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luigi Insabato Line = papers co-authored together Luigi Insabato links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 222 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012331
2 2019138
3 2012132
4 2018114
5 1999111
6 2003110
7 2002110
8 200597
9 201393
10 200593
11 201983
12 201877
13 202076
14 201974
15 201074
16 198865
17 202161
18 202061
19 201959
20 202058

About Luigi Insabato

Luigi Insabato is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 222 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (71 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (39 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (33 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (24 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (22 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (20 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (12 papers) and Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.0k citations), Reproductive Medicine (1.5k citations), Cancer Research (884 citations), Gastroenterology (271 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (665 citations). Luigi Insabato has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Travaglino, Antonio Raffone, Fulvio Zullo, Antonio Mollo, Guido Pettinato, Massimo Mascolo, Gabriele Saccone, Giuseppe De Placido, Dolores Di Vizio and Maurizio Guida. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Apmis and Diagnostic Cytopathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact