Ludwig Hülk

448 total citations
9 papers, 116 citations indexed

About

Ludwig Hülk is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Ludwig Hülk has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 116 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3 papers in Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and 2 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Ludwig Hülk's work include Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (5 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (1 paper) and Renewable Energy and Sustainability (1 paper). Ludwig Hülk is often cited by papers focused on Integrated Energy Systems Optimization (5 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (1 paper) and Renewable Energy and Sustainability (1 paper). Ludwig Hülk collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Italy. Ludwig Hülk's co-authors include Berit Müller, Francesco Gardumi, Guido Pleßmann, J. Beck, Hannah Förster, Eva Méndez, Ana Belén Cristóbal, Christian Hofmann, Carlos del Cañizo and Esther Vogt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews and Energy Strategy Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Ludwig Hülk

8 papers receiving 109 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ludwig Hülk Germany	5	103	20	19	15	13	9	116
Jiancheng Shi China	5	88 0.9×	20 1.0×	22 1.2×	29 1.9×	14 1.1×	11	141
Nina M. Vincent United States	4	114 1.1×	47 2.4×	45 2.4×	17 1.1×	27 2.1×	4	181
Nathaniel Gates United States	6	87 0.8×	30 1.5×	22 1.2×	20 1.3×	12 0.9×	9	168
Neha Patankar United States	9	94 0.9×	51 2.5×	33 1.7×	15 1.0×	14 1.1×	21	186
Daniel Greer United States	4	69 0.7×	20 1.0×	11 0.6×	17 1.1×	10 0.8×	6	100
Nikhil Kumar United States	6	100 1.0×	7 0.3×	16 0.8×	27 1.8×	13 1.0×	13	126
G. Drayton United States	6	268 2.6×	30 1.5×	38 2.0×	37 2.5×	19 1.5×	9	294
Maya Domeshek United States	3	101 1.0×	14 0.7×	23 1.2×	20 1.3×	8 0.6×	5	138
Jens Weibezahn Germany	9	177 1.7×	54 2.7×	50 2.6×	23 1.5×	3 0.2×	21	232
Joshua Novacheck United States	6	66 0.6×	23 1.1×	10 0.5×	4 0.3×	22 1.7×	7	120

Countries citing papers authored by Ludwig Hülk

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ludwig Hülk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludwig Hülk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludwig Hülk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ludwig Hülk

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludwig Hülk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludwig Hülk. The network helps show where Ludwig Hülk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ludwig Hülk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ludwig Hülk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ludwig Hülk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ludwig Hülk. Ludwig Hülk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Pleßmann, Guido, et al.. (2024). open-mastr: A Python Package to Download and Processthe German Energy Registry Marktstammdatenregister. The Journal of Open Source Software. 9(100). 6758–6758.

Vogt, Esther, et al.. (2024). Monitoring Germany's Core Energy System Dataset: A Data Quality Analysis of the Marktstammdatenregister. 4(4). 88–99. 1 indexed citations

Beck, J., et al.. (2022). Data harmonisation for energy system analysis – Example of multi-model experiments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 162. 112472–112472. 6 indexed citations

Corcho, Óscar, Ludwig Hülk, Eva Méndez, et al.. (2020). Practical guide on Open Science for researchers. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

Hofmann, Christian, et al.. (2019). Identification of user requirements for an energy scenario database. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations

Hülk, Ludwig, et al.. (2018). Transparency, reproducibility, and quality of energy system analyses – A process to improve scientific work. Energy Strategy Reviews. 22. 264–269. 13 indexed citations

Pleßmann, Guido, et al.. (2018). The eGo grid model: An open-source and open-data based synthetic medium-voltage grid model for distribution power supply systems. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 977. 12007–12007. 34 indexed citations

Müller, Berit, Francesco Gardumi, & Ludwig Hülk. (2018). Comprehensive representation of models for energy system analyses: Insights from the Energy Modelling Platform for Europe (EMP-E) 2017. Energy Strategy Reviews. 21. 82–87. 37 indexed citations

Hülk, Ludwig, et al.. (2017). Allocation of annual electricity consumption and power generation capacities across multiple voltage levels in a high spatial resolution. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact