Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Ludovic Lebart
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ludovic Lebart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludovic Lebart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludovic Lebart more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludovic Lebart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludovic Lebart. The network helps show where Ludovic Lebart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ludovic Lebart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ludovic Lebart.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ludovic Lebart based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ludovic Lebart. Ludovic Lebart is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lebart, Ludovic. (2004). Validité des visualisations de données textuelles.7 indexed citations
5.
Lebart, Ludovic. (2001). Traitement statistique des questions ouvertes : quelques pistes de recherche. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 142(4). 7–20.4 indexed citations
6.
Heinderyckx, François, et al.. (2001). Mesurer les audiences à l'époque de la convergence médiatique. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 231–241.1 indexed citations
7.
Rajman, Martin & Ludovic Lebart. (1998). Similarités pour données textuelles. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 545–555.6 indexed citations
8.
Frantzi, Katerina T., et al.. (1995). Statistical measures for terminological extraction. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 292–304.4 indexed citations
Lebart, Ludovic. (1994). Sur les analyses statistiques de textes. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 135(1). 17–36.6 indexed citations
11.
Lebart, Ludovic, et al.. (1992). Le repas idéal : analyse de réponses libres en trois langues : anglais, français, japonais. French digital mathematics library (Numdam). 17(3). 327–352.
12.
Lebart, Ludovic. (1989). Stratégies du traitement des données d'enquêtes.. 3. 21–30.3 indexed citations
13.
Lebart, Ludovic & André Salem. (1988). Analyse statistique des donnees textuelles : questions ouvertes et lexicométrie. Dunod eBooks.43 indexed citations
14.
Lebart, Ludovic. (1986). Analyse statistuqye des réponses libres dans les enquêtes par sondage. Revue française du marketing. 37–46.3 indexed citations
Lebart, Ludovic, et al.. (1977). Techniques de la description statistique : méthodes et logiciels pour l'analyse des grands tableaux. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).71 indexed citations
20.
Lebart, Ludovic, et al.. (1973). Statistique et informatique appliquées. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).101 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.