Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Communication top 1%
- Topics
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers)Free Will and Agency (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
12 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Philosophy 880
- Literature and Literary Theory 563
- Sociology and Political Science 494
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 406
- Communication 367
Countries citing papers authored by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. The network helps show where Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Die neue Rhetorik : eine Abhandlung über das Argumentieren | 4 |
| 3 | Tratado de la argumentación : la neuva retórica | 102 |
| 4 | Pareto et l'argumentation | 1 |
| 5 | Bibliographie de Chaim Perelman | 2 |
| 6 | Le comique du discours | 9 |
| 7 | The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentationbreakdown → | 1818 |
| 8 | Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique, Collection de sociologie générale et de philosophie sociale. Éditions de l'Institut de Sociologie de Bruxelles, 2e éd | 32 |
| 9 | Traité de l'argumentation : la nouvelle rhétorique | 111 |
| 10 | La nouvelle rhétorique traité de l'argumentation | 50 |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | Rhétorique Et Philosophie Pour Une Théorie de l'Argumentation En Philosophie | 12 |
| 13 | 33 |
About Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (880 citations), Communication (367 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (563 citations). Frequent co-authors include Chaïm Perelman, John Wilkinson, Julia Sevilla Muñoz, Ch. Perelman and Hans‐Jörg Ehni. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics, Philosophy and Rhetoric and Tijdschrift voor Philosophie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.