Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Literature and Literary Theory.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in Cognitive Neuroscience and 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's work include Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (1 paper). Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca is often cited by papers focused on Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (1 paper). Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca collaborates with scholars based in . Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's co-authors include Chaïm Perelman, John Wilkinson, Julia Sevilla Muñoz, Ch. Perelman and Hans‐Jörg Ehni and has published in prestigious journals such as Ethics, Philosophy and Rhetoric and Tijdschrift voor Philosophie.
In The Last Decade
Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
12 papers
receiving
1.7k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
19711.8k citationsChaïm Perelman, Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca et al.Medical Entomology and Zoologyprofile →
Citations per field, relative to Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca · 1×
×1.51.3kPHILO
×1.4813LLT
×1.6783SPS
×1.3525ECP
×1.2430COMMU
Citations per year, relative to Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Countries citing papers authored by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. The network helps show where Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique, Collection de sociologie générale et de philosophie sociale. Éditions de l'Institut de Sociologie de Bruxelles, 2e éd
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.