Lucie Knight

581 total citations
10 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Lucie Knight is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Lucie Knight has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Lucie Knight's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). Lucie Knight is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers). Lucie Knight collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Slovenia. Lucie Knight's co-authors include Monika Keller, Birgitt Marten‐Mittag, Peter Herschbach, Tobias Brandl, Gerhard Henrich, Bettina Huber, Mathias Riesbeck, Thomas Lehnert, Charlotte Fischer and C Herfarth and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Annals of Oncology and Journal of Psychosomatic Research.

In The Last Decade

Lucie Knight

9 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Lucie Knight United Kingdom 6 308 188 135 114 83 10 438
P. Saltel France 10 289 0.9× 167 0.9× 157 1.2× 99 0.9× 107 1.3× 41 550
Tatsuro Nakanishi Japan 7 313 1.0× 180 1.0× 96 0.7× 129 1.1× 48 0.6× 15 420
W.M. Ling China 9 453 1.5× 170 0.9× 109 0.8× 140 1.2× 77 0.9× 12 625
Rami A. Sela Canada 8 480 1.6× 330 1.8× 110 0.8× 79 0.7× 67 0.8× 8 677
Hitoshi Okamura Japan 7 467 1.5× 232 1.2× 147 1.1× 186 1.6× 75 0.9× 9 649
A. Sawhney United Kingdom 6 232 0.8× 108 0.6× 97 0.7× 85 0.7× 38 0.5× 7 339
Ceinwen E. Cumming Canada 12 172 0.6× 115 0.6× 113 0.8× 85 0.7× 87 1.0× 21 412
Carriene Roorda Netherlands 9 385 1.3× 119 0.6× 123 0.9× 109 1.0× 82 1.0× 9 508
Cecilia Arving Sweden 13 333 1.1× 166 0.9× 100 0.7× 90 0.8× 63 0.8× 28 438
Maria Cho United States 7 329 1.1× 236 1.3× 54 0.4× 59 0.5× 74 0.9× 13 623

Countries citing papers authored by Lucie Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucie Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucie Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucie Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucie Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucie Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucie Knight. The network helps show where Lucie Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucie Knight

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucie Knight. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucie Knight based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucie Knight. Lucie Knight is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Buscemi, Valentina, et al.. (2022). An updated audit of the patient selection process for pain management programmes in a speciality care service before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Pain. 17(3). 226–238. 3 indexed citations
2.
Knight, Lucie, et al.. (2018). Assessment and patient selection process for a pain management programme: a case study in specialty care. British Journal of Pain. 13(2). 74–81. 9 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Jared G., et al.. (2015). Clinical effectiveness of a residential pain management programme – comparing a large recent sample with previously published outcome data. British Journal of Pain. 10(1). 46–58. 17 indexed citations
4.
Knight, Lucie, Monika Mussell, Tobias Brandl, et al.. (2008). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology, a tool for standardized assessment of cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 64(4). 373–381. 32 indexed citations
5.
Keller, Monika, Charlotte Fischer, Lucie Knight, et al.. (2004). Recognition of distress and psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients: a multi-method approach. Annals of Oncology. 15(8). 1243–1249. 175 indexed citations
6.
Knight, Lucie, Tobias Brandl, Peter Herschbach, et al.. (2004). 26-PO-BADO (BASIC DOCUMENTATION IN PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY)—AN EXPERT RATING SCALE FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE PSYCHOSOCIAL CONDITION OF CANCER PATIENTS. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 56(6). 569–569. 1 indexed citations
7.
Herschbach, Peter, Monika Keller, Lucie Knight, et al.. (2004). Psychological problems of cancer patients: a cancer distress screening with a cancer-specific questionnaire. British Journal of Cancer. 91(3). 504–511. 193 indexed citations
8.
Knight, Lucie. (2003). Research Report: How do GPs make referral and treatment decisions when patients present with mental health problems?. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 16(3). 195–221. 5 indexed citations
9.
Knight, Lucie. (1997). A model of short-term counselling in primary care. Counselling Psychology Quarterly. 10(4). 365–376. 1 indexed citations
10.
Knight, Lucie. (1995). Explaining What Counselling Psychology is and What it Can Offer to GPs in Primary Health Care Settings. Counselling Psychology Review. 10(4). 2–4. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026