Luc Pilotte
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.1%
- Immunology top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Oncology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Benoı̂t J. Van den EyndeVincent StroobantDidier ColauCatherine UyttenhoveIvan ThéateNicolas ParmentierThierry BoonPierre Larrieu
- Topics
- Tryptophan and brain disorders (18 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers)Immune cells in cancer (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- BelgiumFranceSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Luc Pilotte
21 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Biological Psychiatry 1.7k
- Immunology 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Oncology 872
- Psychiatry and Mental health 624
Countries citing papers authored by Luc Pilotte
This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Pilotte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Pilotte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Pilotte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luc Pilotte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Pilotte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Pilotte. The network helps show where Luc Pilotte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc Pilotte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc Pilotte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc Pilotte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc Pilotte. Luc Pilotte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 137 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 284 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 148 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 155 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Evidence for a tumoral immune resistance mechanism based on tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenasebreakdown → | 1807 |
About Luc Pilotte
Luc Pilotte is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Immunology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (18 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers) and Immune cells in cancer (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (1.7k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (532 citations) and Immunology (1.3k citations). Luc Pilotte has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Benoı̂t J. Van den Eynde, Vincent Stroobant, Didier Colau, Catherine Uyttenhove, Ivan Théate, Nicolas Parmentier, Thierry Boon, Pierre Larrieu, Raphaël Frédérick and Etienne De Plaen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.