Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Body size and dispersal mode as key traits determining metacommunity structure of aquatic organisms
2012537 citationsLuc De Meester, Koen Martens et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Luc Denys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc Denys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc Denys more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc Denys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc Denys. The network helps show where Luc Denys may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc Denys
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc Denys.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc Denys based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luc Denys. Luc Denys is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Denys, Luc, et al.. (2019). Profielschets van stilstaande wateren in Vlaanderen: een nieuw digitaal bestand voor het natuur- en biodiversiteitsonderzoek. 18(4). 128–135.1 indexed citations
Denys, Luc & Willem H. De Smet. (2010). Epipellis oiketis (Bacillariophyta) on harbor porpoises from the North Sea Channel (Belgium). Polish Botanical Journal. 55(1). 175–182.7 indexed citations
11.
Adriaens, Tim, et al.. (2010). Kwesties uit het veld: Bestrijding van Watercrassula, een lastige invasieve exoot. 9(3). 128–129.1 indexed citations
12.
Louette, Gerald, et al.. (2008). Grootschalig natuurherstel in de Kraenepoel, een geëutrofieerd ondiep meer te Aalter (Oost-Vlaanderen). 7(2). 46–53.1 indexed citations
13.
Denys, Luc, et al.. (2004). Neofyten in het Vlaamse water: signalement van vaste waarden en rijzende sterren. 3(4). 120–128.7 indexed citations
14.
Denys, Luc, et al.. (2003). Cabomba caroliniana (Cabombaceae) houdt stand in Holsbeek (Vlaams-Brabant, België). 80. 35–40.3 indexed citations
15.
Denys, Luc. (1998). Morphology and taxonomy of epizoic diatoms (Epiphalaina and Tursiocola) on a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) stranded on the coast of Belgium. Oceanographic literature review. 1(45). 103–104.22 indexed citations
16.
Denys, Luc. (1997). Amphora hemicycla Stoermer & Yang: een potentiële dubbelganger van A. ovalis Grun.. 21. 74–79.1 indexed citations
Verbruggen, Cyriel, Luc Denys, & Patrick Kiden. (1991). Paleo-ecologische en geomorfologische evolutie van Laag- en Midden-België tijdens het Laat-Kwartair. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).11 indexed citations
19.
Denys, Luc. (1989). Observations on the transition from Calais deposits to surface peat in the Western Belgian coastal plain: results of a paleoenvironmental diatom study. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).1 indexed citations
20.
Denys, Luc. (1984). Diatom analysis of coastal deposits: methodological aspects. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.