Luc De Nil

536 total citations
31 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

Luc De Nil is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luc De Nil has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 16 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Luc De Nil's work include Stuttering Research and Treatment (25 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (20 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers). Luc De Nil is often cited by papers focused on Stuttering Research and Treatment (25 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (20 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (16 papers). Luc De Nil collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Belgium and Netherlands. Luc De Nil's co-authors include Douglas Cheyne, Cecilia Jobst, Elizabeth Rochon, Pascal van Lieshout, Aravind Kumar Namasivayam, Catherine Theys, Astrid Van Wieringen, Regina Jokel, Vincent Thijs and Stefan Sunaert and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neuropsychologia and European Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Luc De Nil

23 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Luc De Nil Canada	10	294	280	214	115	10	31	357
Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg Germany	9	502 1.7×	453 1.6×	393 1.8×	139 1.2×	7 0.7×	19	551
Jason H. Davidow United States	10	327 1.1×	186 0.7×	208 1.0×	150 1.3×	29 2.9×	20	361
Carol Hubbard Seery United States	7	281 1.0×	113 0.4×	177 0.8×	199 1.7×	11 1.1×	8	321
Neeraja Sadagopan United States	9	174 0.6×	247 0.9×	219 1.0×	259 2.3×	56 5.6×	12	439
Eric S. Jackson United States	10	266 0.9×	203 0.7×	195 0.9×	94 0.8×	7 0.7×	35	324
Evan Usler United States	9	195 0.7×	159 0.6×	120 0.6×	193 1.7×	8 0.8×	17	297
Hans-Georg Bosshardt Germany	12	438 1.5×	375 1.3×	272 1.3×	222 1.9×	5 0.5×	22	484
Amanda Hampton Wray United States	10	201 0.7×	260 0.9×	128 0.6×	178 1.5×	2 0.2×	25	352
Vikram N. Dayalu United States	11	272 0.9×	181 0.6×	215 1.0×	112 1.0×	12 1.2×	26	300
Jennifer Kleinow United States	5	332 1.1×	257 0.9×	330 1.5×	170 1.5×	103 10.3×	7	476

Countries citing papers authored by Luc De Nil

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luc De Nil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc De Nil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc De Nil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luc De Nil

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc De Nil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc De Nil. The network helps show where Luc De Nil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc De Nil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc De Nil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc De Nil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc De Nil. Luc De Nil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Cheyne, Douglas, et al.. (2025). The Effects of tDCS on Speech Fluency in People Who Stutter: A Narrative Review. European Journal of Neuroscience. 62(7). e70267–e70267.

Franken, Marie-Christine, et al.. (2024). Erasmus clinical model of the onset and development of stuttering 2.0. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 80. 106040–106040.

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2023). The initiation of a hand grip is delayed by silently reading an incompatible syllable. Psychological Research. 87(8). 2419–2427.

Bitan, Tali, et al.. (2023). Explicit benefits: Motor sequence acquisition and short-term retention in adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 75. 105959–105959. 1 indexed citations

Bitan, Tali, et al.. (2022). Differences in implicit motor learning between adults who do and do not stutter. Neuropsychologia. 174. 108342–108342. 3 indexed citations

Mollaei, Fatemeh, et al.. (2021). White matter microstructural differences underlying beta oscillations during speech in adults who stutter. Brain and Language. 215. 104921–104921. 15 indexed citations

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2020). Effect of word phonetic properties on stuttering anticipation and speech production in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 67. 105803–105803. 1 indexed citations

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2019). A Tool to Reorient Physiotherapy: The Use of the Field Model. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2019). Assessing chronic fatigue syndrome: Self-reported physical functioning and correlations with physical testing. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 23(3). 598–603. 6 indexed citations

10.

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2018). Het gebruik van magnetoencefalografie als hersenbeeldvormingstechniek voor het bestuderen van neurale processen bij ontwikkelingsstotteren. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 24. 1 indexed citations

11.

Cheyne, Douglas, et al.. (2017). A preliminary study on the neural oscillatory characteristics of motor preparation prior to dysfluent and fluent utterances in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 55. 145–155. 22 indexed citations

12.

Jobst, Cecilia, et al.. (2016). Sensorimotor Oscillations Prior to Speech Onset Reflect Altered Motor Networks in Adults Who Stutter. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10. 443–443. 45 indexed citations

13.

Jansson-Verkasalo, Eira, Kurt Eggers, Kalervo Suominen, et al.. (2014). Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 41. 1–11. 36 indexed citations

14.

Namasivayam, Aravind Kumar, Pascal van Lieshout, William E. McIlroy, & Luc De Nil. (2009). Sensory feedback dependence hypothesis in persons who stutter. Human Movement Science. 28(6). 688–707. 26 indexed citations

15.

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2009). Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 23(1). 38–57. 39 indexed citations

16.

Namasivayam, Aravind Kumar, Pascal van Lieshout, & Luc De Nil. (2008). Bite-block perturbation in people who stutter: Immediate compensatory and delayed adaptive processes. Journal of Communication Disorders. 41(4). 372–394. 24 indexed citations

17.

Eggers, Kurt, Luc De Nil, & Bea Van den Bergh. (2008). Temperament and attentional processes in stuttering. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations

18.

Jokel, Regina, et al.. (2007). Speech disfluencies in adults with neurogenic stuttering associated with stroke and traumatic brain injury. 15(3). 243–262. 28 indexed citations

19.

Nil, Luc De, et al.. (2006). The transition to increased automaticity during finger sequence learning in adult males who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 31(1). 22–42. 45 indexed citations

20.

Nil, Luc De. (1994). The role of oral sensory feedback in the coordination of articulatory movements in adults who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders. 19(3). 169–170. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact