L.P.S. van der Geest
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research 14
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control 12
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 12
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 3
-
- Study of Mite Species 5
- Plant Science top 10%
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 12
- Ecology top 10%
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 3
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 12
- Co-authors
- H. H. EvenhuisGilberto J. de MorãesJ. S. YaninekGeorge OduorJan BruinMaurice W. SabelisCarlo DusoW. P. J. Overmeer
- Journals
- Journal of Invertebrate Pathology (7 papers)Experimental and Applied Acarology (5 papers)Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBrazilBenin
In The Last Decade
L.P.S. van der Geest
30 papers receiving 785 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Insect Science 714
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 254
- Plant Science 208
- Ecology 133
- Genetics 124
Countries citing papers authored by L.P.S. van der Geest
This map shows the geographic impact of L.P.S. van der Geest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.P.S. van der Geest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.P.S. van der Geest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by L.P.S. van der Geest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.P.S. van der Geest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.P.S. van der Geest. The network helps show where L.P.S. van der Geest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside L.P.S. van der Geest, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 23 | |
| 7 | Tortricid pests : their biology, natural enemies, and controlbreakdown → | 1991 | 449 |
| 8 | 1991 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1974 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1968 | 23 | |
| 19 | 1968 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1967 | 14 |
About L.P.S. van der Geest
L.P.S. van der Geest is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (14 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (12 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (12 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (12 papers), Study of Mite Species (5 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (3 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (714 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (254 citations) and Plant Science (208 citations). L.P.S. van der Geest has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Brazil and Benin. Frequent co-authors include H. H. Evenhuis, Gilberto J. de Morães, J. S. Yaninek, George Oduor, Jan Bruin, Maurice W. Sabelis, Carlo Duso, W. P. J. Overmeer, Stanisław Bałazy and F.H.M. Borgsteede. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, Experimental and Applied Acarology, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, Journal of Applied Entomology and Journal of Insect Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.