Louis Pinto
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Social Sciences and Governance 6
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- French Urban and Social Studies 15
- Education, sociology, and vocational training 10
- Philosophy top 10%
- Linguistics and Discourse Analysis 5
- Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis 5
-
- Historical and Literary Analyses 5
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 5
-
- Political and Social Issues 5
In The Last Decade
Louis Pinto
55 papers receiving 203 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Urban Studies 42
- History and Philosophy of Science 25
- Sociology and Political Science 189
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 5
- Philosophy 30
Countries citing papers authored by Louis Pinto
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis Pinto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis Pinto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis Pinto. The network helps show where Louis Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Louis Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 4 | Los sobrinos de Zaratustra : Vanguardismo, izquierdismo y posmodernismo | 2013 | 3 |
| 5 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 6 | La théorie souveraine, les philosophes français et la sociologie au XXe siècle | 2009 | 2 |
| 7 | La vocation et le métier de philosophe : pour une sociologie de la philosophie dans la France contemporaine | 2007 | 4 |
| 8 | Comment négocier un tournant ? | 2004 | 1 |
| 9 | Centre de sociologie européenne | 2003 | 1 |
| 10 | Pierre Bourdieu y la teoría del mundo social | 2002 | 12 |
| 11 | Pierre Bourdieu et la théorie du monde social | 1998 | 18 |
| 12 | Streifzüge durch das literarische Feld | 1997 | 1 |
| 13 | Les neveux de Zarathoustra : la réception de Nietzsche en France | 1995 | 4 |
| 14 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 4 |
About Louis Pinto
Louis Pinto is a scholar working on Philosophy, Urban Studies and General Social Sciences, having authored 66 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Urban and Social Studies (15 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (10 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (6 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (5 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (5 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (5 papers), Political and Social Issues (5 papers) and Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (42 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (189 citations). Louis Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in France, Portugal and India. Frequent co-authors include Michel Offerlé, Patrick Champagne, Gisèle Sapiro, Bridget Fowler, Michaël Pollak, François Héran, Gérard Mauger, Rémi Lenoir, Howard S. Becker and Franz Schultheis. Their work appears in journals such as Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, Politix, Genèses, The Sociological Review and Revue Française de Sociologie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.