Louis Menand
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jackson LearsRobert M. O’NeilRichard T. De GeorgeW. B. CarnochanA. Walton LitzMargaret MoranChad WellmonMichael Beehler
- Topics
- Academic Freedom and Politics (4 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers)Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Louis Menand
25 papers receiving 630 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Sociology and Political Science 258
- Political Science and International Relations 197
- Education 171
- Philosophy 170
- Literature and Literary Theory 107
Countries citing papers authored by Louis Menand
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis Menand's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis Menand with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis Menand more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis Menand
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis Menand. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis Menand. The network helps show where Louis Menand may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis Menand
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis Menand. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis Menand based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis Menand. Louis Menand is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | The marketplace of ideas | 27 |
| 3 | The Marketplace of Ideas: Reform and Resistance in the American University | 134 |
| 4 | Modernism and the New Criticism | 5 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Edmund Wilson's Vanished World | 1 |
| 7 | El club de los metafísicos: historia de las ideas en América | 5 |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America | 254 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Pragmatism: A Reader | 76 |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Discovering Modernism: T.S. Eliot and His Context | 26 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Louis Menand
Louis Menand is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, General Social Sciences and Classics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Freedom and Politics (4 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (30 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (73 citations) and Philosophy (170 citations). Louis Menand has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jackson Lears, Robert M. O’Neil, Richard T. De George, W. B. Carnochan, A. Walton Litz, Margaret Moran, Chad Wellmon, Michael Beehler, Calvin Bedient and Lawrence Rainey. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, Journal of American History and American Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.