Lorraine Chow

16 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

Lorraine Chow
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 50
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 70
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 21
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
  • Developmental Neuroscience 11
Replace Farida Gadalla with:
Farida Gadalla United States
Vibeke Moen Sweden
G. R. Lyons United Kingdom
Anjan Das India
Luciano Frassanito Italy
Aleksandar Nikolić Serbia
А. Е. Баутин Russia
Jihion Yu South Korea
Rovnat Babazade United States
Gun Öhqvist Sweden
Lorraine Chow relative to Farida Gadalla United States Farida Gadalla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Farida Gadalla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorraine Chow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorraine Chow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorraine Chow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorraine Chow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorraine Chow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorraine Chow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorraine Chow. The network helps show where Lorraine Chow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorraine Chow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorraine Chow Line = papers co-authored together Lorraine Chow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201860
2 201536
3 201934
4 199634
5 201730
6 202227
7 202125
8 201621
9 201816
10 200512
11 20118
12 20236
13 20165
14 20224
15 20211
16 20171
17 20250
18 20250

About Lorraine Chow

Lorraine Chow is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (50 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (70 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (21 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations). Lorraine Chow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gregory Dobson, R.M. Butler, Alana M. Flexman, Shean Stacey, Kathryn Sparrow, Claude Laflamme, Michael Wong, Barton Thiessen, Matthew Chong and Matt M. Kurrek. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Bone Marrow Transplantation, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America and Current Trauma Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact