Lori K. Smith
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Sergio M. PellisGerlinde A. S. MetzNafisa M. JadavjiEvelyn F. FieldVivien C. PellisMargaret L. ForgieKatrina PerehudoffKarim Fouad
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers)Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers)Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers)
- Journals
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsJournal of Clinical MicrobiologyEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lori K. Smith
17 papers receiving 718 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Social Psychology 315
- Behavioral Neuroscience 222
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 187
- Neurology 129
- Cognitive Neuroscience 89
Countries citing papers authored by Lori K. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Lori K. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori K. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori K. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lori K. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori K. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori K. Smith. The network helps show where Lori K. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lori K. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lori K. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lori K. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lori K. Smith. Lori K. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | Gastric Residuals in Neonates: Evidence-Based Practice Approach | 2 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 96 | |
| 6 | 84 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 124 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 179 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 17 |
About Lori K. Smith
Lori K. Smith is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Aging and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (7 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (222 citations), Social Psychology (315 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (30 citations). Lori K. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sergio M. Pellis, Gerlinde A. S. Metz, Nafisa M. Jadavji, Evelyn F. Field, Vivien C. Pellis, Margaret L. Forgie, Katrina Perehudoff, Karim Fouad, Mark Ballermann and Scott W. Kirkland. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.