Loes van Schaik
- Pollution top 2%
- Soil Science top 2%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 5%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering top 2%
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Violette GeissenBoris SchröderM. LeistraSaskia KeesstraKim P.M. MosseElia ScudieroErwin ZeheSusanne Schnabel
- Topics
- Soil and Unsaturated Flow (12 papers)Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers)Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsSpain
In The Last Decade
Loes van Schaik
32 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Pollution 413
- Soil Science 377
- Civil and Structural Engineering 297
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 283
- Water Science and Technology 283
Countries citing papers authored by Loes van Schaik
This map shows the geographic impact of Loes van Schaik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loes van Schaik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loes van Schaik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Loes van Schaik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loes van Schaik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loes van Schaik. The network helps show where Loes van Schaik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loes van Schaik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loes van Schaik. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loes van Schaik based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Loes van Schaik. Loes van Schaik is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | Review of microplastic sources, transport pathways and correlations with other soil stressors: a journey from agricultural sites into the environmentbreakdown → | 187 |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | Linking earthworm activity and hydrologically effective macropores in space and time | 1 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 69 | |
| 19 | 301 | |
| 20 | Modelling spatiotemporal distribution patterns of earthworms in order to indicate hydrological soil processes. | 1 |
About Loes van Schaik
Loes van Schaik is a scholar working on Soil Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Pollution, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Unsaturated Flow (12 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers) and Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (377 citations), Pollution (413 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (283 citations). Loes van Schaik has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Violette Geissen, Boris Schröder, M. Leistra, Saskia Keesstra, Kim P.M. Mosse, Elia Scudiero, Erwin Zehe, Susanne Schnabel, Frederick Büks and Martin Kaupenjohann. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Journal of Hydrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.