Lloyd Smith
Impact in
- Oncology top 10%
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
-
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment 1
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques 1
-
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment 2
- Co-authors
- Allan Okrainec (1 shared paper)Paul D. Greig (1 shared paper)Maha Guindi (1 shared paper)Sherif S. Hanna (1 shared paper)Bernard Langer (1 shared paper)Robert Gryfe (1 shared paper)Steven Gallinger (1 shared paper)Georges Azzie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Accounting Research (1 paper)Journal of Periodontology (1 paper)Surgical Endoscopy (1 paper)Toxicology (1 paper)Obesity Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lloyd Smith
8 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Oncology 267
- Surgery 204
- Cancer Research 65
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 92
- Gastroenterology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Lloyd Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Lloyd Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lloyd Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lloyd Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lloyd Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lloyd Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lloyd Smith. The network helps show where Lloyd Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Lloyd Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 271 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 3 | Primary colorectal anastomosis with the intracolonic bypass tube. | 1992 | 10 |
| 4 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 2 |
About Lloyd Smith
Lloyd Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Oncology, History and Philosophy of Science and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (1 paper), Oral and gingival health research (1 paper), Anatomy and Medical Technology (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (267 citations), Surgery (204 citations), Cancer Research (65 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (92 citations) and Gastroenterology (14 citations). Lloyd Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Allan Okrainec, Paul D. Greig, Maha Guindi, Sherif S. Hanna, Bernard Langer, Robert Gryfe, Steven Gallinger, Georges Azzie, Sean P. Cleary and Steven Strasberg. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of Periodontology, Surgical Endoscopy, Toxicology and Obesity Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.