Liz Payne

2.4k total citations
27 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Liz Payne is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Liz Payne has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 5 papers in Physiology and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Liz Payne's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). Liz Payne is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers). Liz Payne collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and India. Liz Payne's co-authors include Andrea Takeda, Joanna Kirby, Emma Loveman, Joanna Picot, E Castelnuovo, Ruth Garside, Karen Facey, George Laking, Ian Bradbury and Martin Pitt and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Epidemiology, Health Technology Assessment and Psycho-Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Liz Payne

26 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Liz Payne United Kingdom 17 213 178 155 152 150 27 1.4k
France Vrijens United States 20 174 0.8× 304 1.7× 137 0.9× 240 1.6× 68 0.5× 78 1.2k
Carey Levinton Canada 27 299 1.4× 175 1.0× 281 1.8× 128 0.8× 65 0.4× 44 1.8k
Monica Daeges United States 18 216 1.0× 120 0.7× 290 1.9× 175 1.2× 60 0.4× 24 1.9k
Simu K. Thomas United States 22 204 1.0× 116 0.7× 101 0.7× 305 2.0× 170 1.1× 56 1.5k
Susan Nayfield United States 22 211 1.0× 384 2.2× 190 1.2× 251 1.7× 100 0.7× 35 2.7k
Shahrul Mt‐Isa United Kingdom 19 251 1.2× 87 0.5× 97 0.6× 60 0.4× 232 1.5× 52 1.3k
Tessa Kennedy‐Martin United States 18 439 2.1× 186 1.0× 201 1.3× 82 0.5× 87 0.6× 28 2.1k
Priscilla Velentgas United States 18 188 0.9× 107 0.6× 318 2.1× 149 1.0× 52 0.3× 42 1.8k
Nigel S. B. Rawson Canada 22 322 1.5× 110 0.6× 164 1.1× 202 1.3× 96 0.6× 85 2.0k
Maurizio Belfiglio Italy 23 90 0.4× 115 0.6× 177 1.1× 344 2.3× 80 0.5× 48 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Liz Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liz Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liz Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liz Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liz Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liz Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liz Payne. The network helps show where Liz Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Liz Payne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Liz Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Liz Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Liz Payne. Liz Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seppala, Lotta J, et al.. (2025). Adherence to Oral Nutritional Supplements: A Review of Trends in Intervention Characteristics and Terminology Use Since the Year 2000. Food Science & Nutrition. 13(1). e4722–e4722. 1 indexed citations
3.
Harris, P, Liz Payne, Leanne Morrison, et al.. (2019). Barriers and facilitators to screening and treating malnutrition in older adults living in the community: a mixed-methods synthesis. BMC Family Practice. 20(1). 100–100. 44 indexed citations
4.
Seidman, Laura C., et al.. (2019). (331) Impact of Primary Dysmenorrhea on Self-Image in Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Pain. 20(4). S57–S58. 1 indexed citations
5.
Frampton, Geoff K, Liz Payne, Jill L Colquitt, et al.. (2017). Fundus autofluorescence imaging: systematic review of test accuracy for the diagnosis and monitoring of retinal conditions. Eye. 31(7). 995–1007. 23 indexed citations
6.
Payne, Liz. (2014). Personality profiling tools. Training & Development. 41(6). 7. 1 indexed citations
7.
Turner, Sheila, Ruairidh Milne, Andrew Cook, et al.. (2009). The adaptation of health technology assessment reports: Identification of the need for, and development of, a toolkit to aid the process. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 25(S2). 28–36. 14 indexed citations
8.
Turner, Sheila, Ruairidh Milne, Andrew Cook, et al.. (2009). The health technology assessment adaptation toolkit: Description and use. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 25(S2). 37–41. 27 indexed citations
9.
Glanville, Julie, Susan Bayliss, Andrew Booth, et al.. (2008). So many filters, so little time: the development of a search filter appraisal checklist. Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA. 96(4). 356–361. 66 indexed citations
10.
Shepherd, Jonathan, et al.. (2007). Setting the future policy agenda for health technology assessment: A specialty mapping approach. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 23(4). 405–413. 6 indexed citations
11.
Facey, Karen, Ian Bradbury, George Laking, & Liz Payne. (2007). Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. Health Technology Assessment. 11(44). iii–iv, xi. 159 indexed citations
12.
Kirby, Joanna, Colin Green, Emma Loveman, et al.. (2006). A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Memantine in Patients with Moderately Severe to Severe Alzheimer???s Disease. Drugs & Aging. 23(3). 227–240. 17 indexed citations
13.
Fisher, David J., Janis Baird, Liz Payne, et al.. (2006). Are infant size and growth related to burden of disease in adulthood? A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Epidemiology. 35(5). 1196–1210. 42 indexed citations
14.
Loveman, Emma, Joanna Kirby, Andrea Takeda, et al.. (2006). The clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for Alzheimer's disease. Health Technology Assessment. 10(1). iii–iv, ix. 150 indexed citations
15.
Dalziel, Kim, A Round, Ken Stein, et al.. (2005). Do the findings of case series studies vary significantly according to methodological characteristics?. Health Technology Assessment. 9(2). iii–iv, 1. 78 indexed citations
16.
Takeda, Andrea, Emma Loveman, Andrew Clegg, et al.. (2005). A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine on cognition, quality of life and adverse events in Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 21(1). 17–28. 163 indexed citations
17.
Dinnes, Jacqueline, Andrea Takeda, Jonathan Shepherd, et al.. (2005). Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (Xigris®) for the treatment of severe sepsis in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. 9(11). 1–126, iii. 177 indexed citations
18.
Bryant, J, Hå̊kan Brodin, Emma Loveman, Liz Payne, & Andrew Clegg. (2005). The clinical and cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment. 9(36). 1–150, iii. 25 indexed citations
20.
Payne, Liz. (1965). Computers in Diagnosis. BMJ. 2(5465). 821.5–822. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026