Litha Pepas
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Papers in ⓘ
- Surgery 5
- Genital Health and Disease 3
-
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research 3
- Co-authors
- Colin J. Davis (2 shared papers)Andrew Bryant (3 shared papers)Sonali Kaushik (3 shared papers)Andy Nordin (3 shared papers)Theresa A Lawrie (3 shared papers)Rezan A. Kadir (1 shared paper)Heather O Dickinson (1 shared paper)Robert Tulloh (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3 papers)Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology (2 papers)PLoS Medicine (1 paper)European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (1 paper)Obstetrics and Gynecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Litha Pepas
12 papers receiving 229 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 81
- Reproductive Medicine 73
- Epidemiology 112
- Dermatology 26
- Surgery 105
Countries citing papers authored by Litha Pepas
This map shows the geographic impact of Litha Pepas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Litha Pepas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Litha Pepas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Litha Pepas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Litha Pepas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Litha Pepas. The network helps show where Litha Pepas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Litha Pepas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 8 | Outcome and patient acceptance of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. | 2004 | 16 |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 1 |
About Litha Pepas
Litha Pepas is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 237 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Genital Health and Disease (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper) and Urologic and reproductive health conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (81 citations), Reproductive Medicine (73 citations), Epidemiology (112 citations), Dermatology (26 citations) and Surgery (105 citations). Litha Pepas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. Davis, Andrew Bryant, Sonali Kaushik, Andy Nordin, Theresa A Lawrie, Rezan A. Kadir, Heather O Dickinson, Robert Tulloh, John Simpson and Annette Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, PLoS Medicine, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.