Lisbeth Lassen
About
In The Last Decade
Lisbeth Lassen
4 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Neurology 121
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 87
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 26
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 14
- Immunology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Lassen
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Lassen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Lassen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Lassen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Lassen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Lassen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Lassen. The network helps show where Lisbeth Lassen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisbeth Lassen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisbeth Lassen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisbeth Lassen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisbeth Lassen. Lisbeth Lassen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 106 | |
| 4 | [Cerebral venous thrombosis in Behçet's disease]. | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.