Lisa O’Donoghue
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 5
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 4
- Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research 2
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 1
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 10
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 1
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies 15
-
- Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments 1
- Co-authors
- Kathryn J. SaundersJulie McClellandNicola S. LoganAlicja R. RudnickaChristopher G. OwenSara J. McCulloughL.K. PourshahidiDiego Cobice
- Journals
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (8 papers)Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics (4 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Lisa O’Donoghue
17 papers receiving 711 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Ophthalmology 457
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 501
- Epidemiology 605
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
- Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa O’Donoghue
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa O’Donoghue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa O’Donoghue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa O’Donoghue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa O’Donoghue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa O’Donoghue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa O’Donoghue. The network helps show where Lisa O’Donoghue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Lisa O’Donoghue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 58 | |
| 3 | Visual Profile of Children Passing/Failing a UK School Vision Screening Protocol | 2016 | 0 |
| 4 | 2016 | 98 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 82 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 118 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 18 | Prevalence of Childhood Refractive Error in the United Kingdom | 2009 | 1 |
About Lisa O’Donoghue
Lisa O’Donoghue is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (10 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (2 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (457 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (501 citations) and Epidemiology (605 citations). Lisa O’Donoghue has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn J. Saunders, Julie McClelland, Nicola S. Logan, Alicja R. Rudnicka, Christopher G. Owen, Sara J. McCullough, L.K. Pourshahidi, Diego Cobice, Paul Mitchell and Kathryn Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, British Journal of Ophthalmology, PLoS ONE and Clinical and Experimental Optometry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.