Lisa Glaser

474 citations
16 papers · 226 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lisa Glaser

16 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Lisa Glaser
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 161
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 147
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 96
  • Mathematical Physics 42
  • Computational Mathematics 2
Replace W. Westra with:
W. Westra Netherlands
Luc Vinet Canada
Harold Erbin France
Sumati Surya India
J. Gizbert-Studnicki Poland
Shouxin Chen China
Daniel Canarutto Italy
Kazuyasu Shigemoto Japan
Toshio Nakatsu Japan
Lisa Glaser relative to W. Westra Netherlands W. Westra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
W. Westra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Glaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Glaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Glaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Glaser. The network helps show where Lisa Glaser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Lisa Glaser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisa Glaser Line = papers co-authored together Lisa Glaser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201347
2 201333
3
\nEuclidian 4d quantum gravity with a non-trivial measure term
201326
4 201419
5 201915
6 201315
7 201214
8 202013
9 202012
10 20178
11 19668
12
The Hartle-Hawking wave function in 2d causal set quantum gravity
20146
13 20124
14 20164
15 20231
16 20191

About Lisa Glaser

Lisa Glaser is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 226 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (13 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (7 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (4 papers), Topological and Geometric Data Analysis (4 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications (1 paper) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (161 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (147 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (96 citations), Mathematical Physics (42 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Lisa Glaser has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. Ambjørn, Fay Dowker, Y. Watabiki, Sumati Surya, A. Görlich, J. Jurkiewicz, John W. Barrett, R. Loll, Jamie Tattersall and Herbert K. Dreiner. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Letters B, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Journal of Geometry and Physics, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical and Comptes Rendus Physique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact