Ling-Ling Lee

33 papers receiving 753 citations

Peers

Ling-Ling Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Applied Psychology 85
  • Developmental Biology 33
  • Ecological Modeling 38
  • Physiology 225
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 68
Replace Elizabeth Procter-Gray with:
Elizabeth Procter-Gray United States
Delphine Legrand Belgium
Alissa R. Link United States
Beth Hahn United States
Zhengzhen Wang China
Anna Cabral Brazil
Angela Pezic Australia
Lissa Spencer Australia
Meghan E. Short United States
Adrian Hutber United States
Ling-Ling Lee relative to Elizabeth Procter-Gray United States Elizabeth Procter-Gray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Elizabeth Procter-Gray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling-Ling Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling-Ling Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling-Ling Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling-Ling Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling-Ling Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling-Ling Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling-Ling Lee. The network helps show where Ling-Ling Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling-Ling Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling-Ling Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ling-Ling Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008199
2 200693
3 201083
4 200875
5 200746
6 202239
7 200535
8 200130
9 200923
10 200320
11 201920
12 200618
13 202117
14 200014
15 199614
16
Temporal Variations in the Size and Composition of Formosan Leaf- nosed Bat (Hipposideros terasensis) Colonies in Central Taiwan
200412
17 202211
18 20108
19 20168
20 20107

About Ling-Ling Lee

Ling-Ling Lee is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Physiology, Ecology, Paleontology and Molecular Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (7 papers), Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Marine animal studies overview (3 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (3 papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (85 citations), Developmental Biology (33 citations), Ecological Modeling (38 citations), Physiology (225 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (68 citations). Ling-Ling Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Antony Arthur, Mark Avis, Shun‐Tsung Lo, Michael Craig Watson, Caroline Mulvaney, Shoa‐Jen Perng, Yin‐Ping Fang, Gábor Csorba, Cheng‐Hua Huang and Tai‐Li Chen. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Studies, International Journal of Primatology, Journal of Mammalogy, Preventive Medicine and JAMA Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact