Ling-Ling Hwang

1.3k citations
41 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Ling-Ling Hwang

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Ling-Ling Hwang
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 466
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 514
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 280
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 167
  • Microbiology 51
Replace Shawn Shoham with:
Shawn Shoham Israel
Alok De United States
Muralidhara Padigaru Türkiye
John K.M. Coleman United States
Mary Ann Greco United States
Sujira Mukda Thailand
Jakob M. Koch Austria
Yali Peng China
Fumiko Takenoya Japan
Esmaeil Akbari Iran
Ling-Ling Hwang relative to Shawn Shoham Israel Shawn Shoham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Shawn Shoham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ling-Ling Hwang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ling-Ling Hwang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ling-Ling Hwang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ling-Ling Hwang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ling-Ling Hwang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ling-Ling Hwang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ling-Ling Hwang. The network helps show where Ling-Ling Hwang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ling-Ling Hwang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ling-Ling Hwang Line = papers co-authored together Ling-Ling Hwang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000186
2 2016100
3 201094
4 200371
5 199157
6 201655
7 201855
8 201853
9 201150
10 199532
11 199730
12 201227
13 200424
14 201824
15 199320
16 199720
17 201719
18 199615
19 199815
20 199414

About Ling-Ling Hwang

Ling-Ling Hwang is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (13 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (6 papers), Healthcare and Venom Research (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (4 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (466 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (514 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (280 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (167 citations) and Microbiology (51 citations). Ling-Ling Hwang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nae J. Dun, Lih‐Chu Chiou, Chiung-Tong Chen, Jaw-Kang Chang, C.L. Ho, Yen-Hsien Lee, Ken Mackie, Hsin-Jung Lee, S.L. Dun and Jen‐Kun Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Toxicon, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact